on his actions. they need a state of mind that he deliberately did that action. the whole debate of did he really believe it or not, that s some of trump s defense, trying to argue that he had din something correct versus illegal. what is the threshold of proving that? the threshold is based on the totality of the circumstances, they ll need to convince the jury that he had the intent to do these conspiratorial actions. that wasn t by accident. he s going to try to blur that with the advice of counsel type of defense. but for trump s defense, they would like to move the debate to, what did he really believe? there s a lot of political appeal, obviously. for him, his political appeal and his legal defense are unusually totally intertwined at the moment. but they don t really have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he truly believed he lost
Following a three-week break, the National Dialogue discussed amendments to legislation regulating the exercise of political rights, reports Gamal Essam El-Din
Egypt's parliament – the House of Representatives – approved Monday new amendments to the Income Tax Law no912005 to raise annual income tax exemption to EGP 36,000 up from EGP 24,000