then the lawyer, evan corcoran, who wrote, it was of course going to end up in the grand jury. that is of course where we are. no surprise for us, and faithful viewers of this program saw it coming. what should that document have said? the document certainly implies that the lawyers do this diligent search themselves. but if they don t if the lawyers don t do the diligent search themselves, should they have written a document that says donald trump told us that he conducted a diligent search, or andrew weissmann told us that he conducted a diligent search? should they have, in that written document, assigned to someone specifically the responsibility for the so-called diligent search? so, very often lawyers don t do that and they leave it vague precisely so they are not getting anyone in trouble or they are not totally pinning down who said what to whom. and here, there was nothing improper about keeping it vague. but it is also the case that the government is entitled to find out
diligent search themselves. if the lawyers don t do the diligent search themselves, should they have written a document that says donald trump told us that he conducted a diligent search, or andrew weizmann told us that he conducted a diligent search? should it sounded to someone specifically, the responsibility, for this so-called diligent search? very often lawyers do not do that and they leave a vague precisely so that they are not getting anyone in trouble or pinning down who said what to whom. here, there was nothing improper about keeping it vague. but it is also the case that the government is entitled to find out who made those statements. we know that these statements were false, but it was not improper for somebody to not described in that statement exactly who told them that. but the government is entitled