Either and film from the outside aaron nick watt. Thank you very much. Those mass something weve started to see it all these protests toto conceal identity. Thank you. And thanks to all of you. Its time for henderson good evening from new york or the Tabloid Publisher who said the former president was a mentor to him, described today what he did to help that mentor when the white house and high from washington, where the Supreme Court heard arguments today for and against making any former president immune from criminal prosecution. Fusion for acts in office. And letting this one off the hook for trying to stay in the white house despite losing the election to courtrooms. Two cases, one person at the center of both, which in itself is something that a single individual should be responsible for todays legal traffic jam. And tonights splitscreen special primetime converge here in new york. The former president s criminal trial continued with more testimony from his onetime friend and fo
That moment, according to pecker house, Karen Doing Two which pecker says he replied, quote, shes doing well, shes quiet. Everything is going good in another conversation, pecker said trump preferred to mcdougal is our girl. Pecker also suggested that trump was angry about the interviews i did with her and Stormy Daniels when each broke their silence will bring you excerpts in our coverage tonight. In washington, the Supreme Court oral arguments were underway and the conservatives who as we know, have a majority on the court, appeared to embrace at least some form of criminal immunity for president s, the liberal minority, by contrast, focused on the temptation that might be it for a future president if they have that what im i more worried about using to be worried about the president being chilled. I think that we would have a really significant Opposite Problem if the president wasnt chilled if someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world with the greate
Since you wrote sapiens. It was a worldwide hit, and in essence, it was a very sort of positive explanation of how we humans have come to sort of dominate this planet. It was about our ability to cooperate, to tell shared stories, to give ourselves common purpose. Ijust wonder whether in the last decade, youve lost some of that optimism. I think our shared stories and our ability to cooperate, both as a species, but also on the national level, is collapsing in more and more places. I see it now in my home country of israel, which is really on the verge maybe of a constitutional crisis or even a civil war. Maybe what we need to understand specifically about democracies is that democracy, in essence, is a conversation. You know, dictatorship, there is one person dictates everything. Democracy is trying to reach some agreement through conversation, and conversation is not always possible. For most of history, large scale conversation was just technically impossible. You had small scale de
Since you wrote sapiens. It was a worldwide hit, and in essence, it was a very sort of positive explanation of how we humans have come to sort of dominate this planet. It was about our ability to cooperate, to tell shared stories, to give ourselves common purpose. Ijust wonder whether in the last decade, youve lost some of that optimism. I think our shared stories and our ability to cooperate, both as a species, but also on the national level, is collapsing in more and more places. I see it now in my home country of israel, which is really on the verge maybe of a constitutional crisis or even a civil war. Maybe what we need to understand specifically about democracies is that democracy, in essence, is a conversation. You know, dictatorship, there is one person dictates everything. Democracy is trying to reach some agreement through conversation, and conversation is not always possible. For most of history, large scale conversation was just technically impossible. You had small scale de
It is now more than a decade since you wrote sapiens. It was a worldwide hit, and in essence, it was a very sort of positive explanation of how we humans have come to sort of dominate this planet. It was about our ability to cooperate, to tell shared stories, to give ourselves common purpose. I just wonder whether, in the last decade, youve lost some of that optimism. I think our shared stories and our ability to cooperate, both as a species, but also on the national level, is collapsing in more and more places. I see it now in my home country of israel, which is really on the verge, maybe, of a constitutional crisis or even a civil war. Maybe what we need to understand, specifically, about democracies is that democracy, in essence, is a conversation. You know, dictatorship, there is one person dictates everything. Democracy is trying to reach some agreement through conversation, and conversation is not always possible. For most of history, large scale conversation was just technically