Latest Breaking News On - Didnt the court - Page 1 : comparemela.com
same offense. they came down in the minority. they ve been the minority in more cases than any of the liberals. paul: dan, what do you think? it s interesting, the cross issue is fascinating, it wasn t 5-4. some people thought it would be. justice alito s opinion managed to bring along kagan and bryor, 7-2, a pretty strong majority. justice s gorsuch s concurrence, he talked about something called the offended observer, the cross is that is in the middle of the road in maryland, people drive by, saying i m offended by it, violates my sense of religious independence. gorsuch raises the question about how can you file a supreme court lawsuit simply because you re offended by something. have you to have some standing to sue. why didn t the court, he said, go all the way and simply say that explicitly. paul: that s an interesting question. maybe because they didn t have
Paul-gigot
People
Cases
Liberals
Dan-henninger
Wasnt-5-4
Minority
Offense
The-cross-issue
Individual
4
5
and nixon did dismiss but it was about documents and not testimony. in my opinion, president trump as the president, as a political elected official represented all of the american people, should not resist a subpoena but said voluntarily do exactly what president clinton did. chris: in the paula jones case, didn t the court ruled that the president wasn t above the law and he had to get involved in the civil suit? the answer is yes. he was forced to testify in the civil suit. we don t have a test as to whether he can be subpoenaed, but in the language in the nixon versus the united states, there is language that goes beyond documentary production and testimonial production that the president is cool, not above the law.i think he will have to testify. chris: i want to get to one final question and that is the question of credibility. because president trump apparently misled the american people on air force one in
Donald-trump
Subpoena
People
Testimony
Trump
Official
Elected
Opinion
Documents
Richard-nixon
Chris-wallace
President
iraq war. he joined the president s staff on the white house counsel back then to help deal with the overwhelming number of subpoenas that were crushing the administration in its waning days. he s more of a professional visor.maybe sending mixed signals this week. chris: the president seems to have decided, the reason for this change is that mueller is coming after him. and whether it ends up in court or it ends up in congress with an impeachment proceeding, that he needs to discredit whatever mueller finds and to rally his political base. do you agree with that? absolutely. that s why you see the president talking about witchhunt.what you see rudy giuliani saying this is a garbage investigation.i think the hiring of emmett flood with someone that helps president clinton with his impeachment issues suggest he s looking for that skill set.
Donald-trump
Deal
Number
Subpoenas
Administration
Counsel
White-house
Staff
Iraq-war
Chris-wallace
Didnt-the-court
Reason
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.