of legal fees for gibson s with about 32 million that oberlin owes. they are continuing to fight it, they have appealed it, they are continuing to attack the bakery. in fact in a really extraordinary move, after the trial was over, they tried to get unsealed facebook records from one of the gibson s children, the clerk. the students who wasn t a party, didn t testify and why release these facebook records? it s because oberlin continues to demonize this small family bakery, refuses to accept any responsibility for what they did to them and shows no remorse and they are appealing at. they fired additional lawyers for the appeal. they ve already spent or their insurers spent $5 million fighting this little bakery and they just cannot seem tucker: shafting the little people. oberlin, meanwhile for viewers who are not aware, it s like the scary type of the annoying rich kid school. it is not actually a real college but it s incredibly expensive but it s incredibly expensive and i have
and now you re speculating. hold on a second, sean, it is not on me to tell you who wrote it. the document is legitimate, it comes from the irs. it echoed what is in their manual and the onus is on you to protect the president to say it is bogus, not on me. the onus on you is to report the official stance of the irs. which is not contained in that memo. but in the manual and the same as the memo. and what we re told is you have to have a legitimate legislative purpose and to harass the president of the united states because you want to continue the russia farce investigation, have at it. but here is my point, chris. let s stop moving the goalpost. let s abide by the law. the president is not required to disclose his taxes and he did a summary and on the last show you said bob mueller is the gold standard, whatever he said we have to abide by. yes. well bob mueller did his report and then i can t believe it because he didn t find anything on obstruction because the pre
memo. but in the manual and the same as the memo. and what we re told is you have to have a legitimate legislative purpose and to harass the president of the united states because you want to continue the russia farce investigation, have at it. but here is my point, chris. let s stop moving the goalpost. let s abide by the law. the president is not required to disclose his taxes and he did a summary and on the last show you said bob mueller is the gold standard, whatever he said we have to abide by. yes. well bob mueller did his report and then i can t believe it because he didn t find anything on obstruction because the president didn t testify and his hands were tied and he left it to congress. as we talked over two years you didn t say i ll only abide by bob mueller report if donald trump testifies. no, you said i would because i was told by the united states of the president that he would testify. and if i don t like the
at a party ever. in her letter to senator feinstein she said that there were four other people at the house. but none of those people nor i live near columbia country club. all four witnesses who were alleged to be at the event said it didn t happen. okay. so here s the truth. those four people did not say it didn t happen. what they said was they had no memory of it or no knowledge of it or no recollection of it. that s different. her friend leland kaiser told the washington post that while she doesn t remember the party she believes ford s story. that s why a full investigation is crucial here. and if you think she is credible or if you think he is credible, there s one man who holds the key to getting to the truth of that, and that man is mark judge. not testifying. didn t testify. that s kavanaugh s friend. the man christine blasey ford says was in the room when kavanaugh assaulted her, allegedly assaulted her. now, if judge kavanaugh is innocent, the question is why
that s different. her friend leland kaiser told the washington post that while she doesn t remember the party she believes ford s story. that s why a full investigation is crucial here. and if you think she is credible or if you think he is credible, there s one man who holds the key to getting to the truth of that, and that man is mark judge. not testifying. didn t testify. that s kavanaugh s friend. the man christine blasey ford says was in the room when kavanaugh assaulted her, allegedly assaulted her. now, if judge kavanaugh is innocent, the question is why doesn t he want his old friend to testify? mark judge was a close friend of yours in high school. now, dr. ford as you know has said he was in the room when she was attacked. she also says you were too. unfortunately, the fbi has never interviewed him.