tower in 2016. this contradicts the president and junior s accounts, so if this is a true, how damaging could this be? i m not sure how big of a deal it would be when it comes legally i think there could be implications if anyone didn t tell the truth under oath, but i think politically this would be a bilge deal. people say that president trump is untouchable in a tense, but i think to tell such a if it turns out to be true to tell up a bold lie about your conduct and so say you didn t know something about such a pivotal meeting, to do that, i think it would affect president trump. i think this would be something that would be hard for him to defend and hard for this administration to defend. speaking of lying, jonathan, rudy giuliani is claiming that
we can pass a conservative agenda and he ll just sign it so we ll look the other way and deal with it. jeff flake says nine months in, can t go that way anymore. we must never regard as normal the regular and casual undermining of our democratic norms and ideals. we must never meekly accept the daily sundering of our country. the personal attacks, the threats against principles, freedoms and institution, the flagrant disregard for truth and decency. it the reckless provocations, most often for the pettiest and most personal reasons, reasons having nothing whatsoever to do with the fortunes of the people that we have been elected to serve. if you listen to that, i mean, there was criticism of reagan during iran-contra, you blew it, didn t tell the truth to the american people. there was a lot of criticism of bill clinton during impeachment. joe lieberman. nothing like this.
by the previous administration. he was vetted thoroughly, turfed out of the previous administrati administration. he comes into the new administration without a lot of investigate. you asked for his security clearance to be revoked. you have paul manafort, and jared kushner who didn t tell the truth on his forms to get a security clearance. this pattern all seems to be pointing to connections to russia, dealings with russia. can all of that be a coins dent dense from your point of view, sir? it s a deeply troubling pattern that it defies the claim that it s completely coincidental. and that s why we need a special prosecutor because the trump administration can ting investigating one of its own, general flynn or anybody else who was an associate of the trump administration or the transition team or the campaign who may be linked to the russian interference in our elections. there is no qution, joy, that there was interrence by the russians. it is unanimously and uniformly accepted by
who was so evil? explain worst case scenario about the e-mail story. what does it say about hillary clinton as a disqualifying factor of her candidacy? trump always paints with a broad brush. there was about portraying her as someone who is not truthful, who is careless, who had something to hide. that s it. it was a big broad brush theme. lock her up chapters, everything else. it was all about, you can t trust her. maybe she did something illegal. if we re supposed to take him literally that s what he was saying. the big picture was, she s not trustworthy. from a guy who didn t tell the truth for the kids, great grandkids, how do you explain to hillary how she messed it up? it s almost like whitewater, it ends up being nothing. these clinton stories are faux scandals. not quite scandals. well, the fact is, jennifer palmeri was very emotional to the point of tears almost saying, she thought they made a mistake by legitimizing this as
pit people against each other. they want a leader who is going to bring this state together, and that certainly has not been the approach that he has taken. will you run against him, mayor barrett? will you go back for a rematch? i m running right now i m running for mayor, running for re-election for mayor. i love being the mayor of the city of milwaukee so that s what i m looking at. professor melissa harris-perry, let me show you an ad from the pro-walker side complaining about sour grapes. i m not big on recalls, and i think at this point, in my opinion, it feels a little like sour grapes. it s, you know, we didn t get our way so we want to change the outcome. it s not about being popular, you know. it s not about getting the votes. this is what is right. professor, is it sour grapes? well, look, you know, the interesting thing is in part i am actually not a big fan of recall elections either just in pure theory. when you re looking at recalls, what you re looking at