a formal subpoena from the united states congress. the most prominent being the acting white house chief of staff mick mulvaney. he was ordered to testify friday and just didn t show up. since then there s also a couple of other people who haven t been subpoenaed, but whose testimonies have been requested. republicans want to hear from the whistle-blower whose name and face we still don t know and former national security adviser john bolton, house democrats scheduled bolton to go under oath as well this past week. he said no, again, he wasn t subpoenaed but since then bolton has made an interesting statement through his lawyer. he says he s got information to share from meetings and conversations that haven t been part of the testimony so far. but he s still not volunteering to come forward then today president trump dropping a tease of his own telling reporters there s another transcript from another phone call with the president of ukraine. he wants everyone to read bit and promises
bolton there. but glenn s right, if you re not going to come forward and be truth and transparent, we ll just assume you were going to hurt the ultimate person, which is president trump. is that a safe assumption to make, though, as the democrats are trying to gather evidence? because we are dealing with an administration here, including the president himself, who routinely say things on the record publicly and then routinely do not want to do the same in a setting like a hearing or a more sort of stratified setting. well, is there a fear that maybe later on during the senate trial because listen, that s an inevitable thing. we re going to get articles of impeachment against donald trump. we re going to go to a trial in the senate. is there a fear that maybe they ll come forward during the senate trial and say something that supports donald trump? sure, but will we really be surprised? no. we have people who have come forward under oath, under penalties of perjury and have said w
you were sleeping? bill: i keep my phone in my kitchen. sandra: that s in the river. bill: that s exec right! my ipad is a different story. good luck as we can. the sandra: go tigers, purple and gold. that s it for us. we will see you back on monday. outnumbered starts now. harris: fox news alert with this radical and president trump setting up his criticism of democrats and piquant inquiry ahead of public hearings which are set to begin next week. today, acting white house chief of staff mick mulvaney divide house could make out subpoenas to testify. didn t show up. the president told reporters a short time ago that he would be fine with mulvaney testifying. however, he called democrats investigation illegitimate. watch. i don t want to give them credibility to a corrupt witch hunt. i would love to have him go up, frankly. i think he would do great. i would love to have him go up. i would love to have almost every person go up, when they know me. what i don t like is
the funding? yeah. the white house says mulvaney won t cooperate and if he doesn t, he won t be alone. john bolton was supposed to be deposed today but didn t show up. that doesn t mean he s refusing out right. the washington post reporting bolton does not want to compile with the democratic inquiry without a court ruling on the on going constitutional dispute between the trump administration and congress. here to talk about it, barrett burger, former assistant u.s. attorney with the eastern district of new york and southern district of new york. good to see you sgen. good to see you. among the people that are invited to come or don t come, the john bolton thing seems to be a category to itself. what is the argument they are trying to make or waiting for for the courts? so it seems they set up this sort of strange condition, right? they said we re willing to come in if you give us the subpoena
that is absolutely appropriate. the funding? yeah. the white house says mulvaney won t cooperate and if he doesn t, he won t be alone. john bolton was supposed to be deposed today but didn t show up. that doesn t mean he s refusing out right. the washington post reporting bolton does not want to compile with the democratic inquiry without a court ruling on the on going constitutional dispute between the trump administration and congress. here to talk about it, barrett burger, former assistant u.s. attorney with the eastern district of new york and southern district of new york. good to see you sgen. good to see you. among the people that are invited to come or don t come, the john bolton thing seems to be a category to itself. what is the argument they are trying to make or waiting for for the courts? so it seems they set up this sort of strange condition, right? they said we re willing to come