with respect to his testimony, i think there is ample evidence there that he had mishandled his position and the authority that he was given as director of the fbi. this to me does not, as a surprise that it happened. quite honestly, as a former prosecutor i was expecting it to even happen sooner in terms of it being a problem with the public trust. and someone that really overstepped his bounds and assuming the role essentially as loretta lynch. it is not that comey is gone because you can make a case that you should have been fired a long time ago. be immediately back in july. but why now? what did rod rosenstein see that sally yates didn t see when she was the deputy attorney general? if he was going to be fired for what he did, it was such an egregious violation of his position there as director of the fbi, why didn t sally yates
think there is ample evidence there that he had mishandled his position and the authority that he was given as director of the fbi. this to me does not, as a surprise that it happened. quite honestly, as a former prosecutor i was expecting it to even happen sooner in terms of it being a problem with the public trust. and someone that really overstepped his bounds and assuming the role essentially as loretta lynch. it is not that comey is gone because you can make a case that he should have been fired a long time ago. immediately back in july. but why now? what did rod rosenstein see that sally yates didn t see when she was the deputy attorney general? if he was going to be fired for what he did, it was such an egregious violation of his position there as director of the fbi, why didn t sally yates make the recommendation to loretta lynch? would then make the