Former GOP representative Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezinski interview newsmakers, politicians and pundits about the issues of the day. Elections . When were picking whos going to be running the house and the senate . I think right track wrong track is a very important indicator. That and theres often polling numbers of, does this guy or this person, this Candidate Fight for people like you . Those are the type of polls i find a little more credible. Astonishing to me is that it can be down at 35 when the economy on its surface and in its aggregate numbers is doing so well. Id ask an expert like John Heilemann or somebody, have you ever seen right track being 35 when unemployment is below 4 . And since i think the economic numbers wont always be as good, this could really tumble down if theres if there starts to be any blips in the economy. Especially from this continued china trade dispute, which could, you know, start bringing down the economy a little bit. So, joe, since walter invi
justices out in force trying to tell us that the court is actually above politics. i m not sure every american believes it. in part, do you think they may not believe it is because the former president himself was the one who would call out by name justices he appointed who didn t rule in the way that he wanted them to? hasn t he done a lot to make the court politicized? i think certainly the former president s remarks about his own judges that he put on the court are part of it. i think it s a larger political problem where you had vacancies go unfilled so members of the senate can wait to fill them when there s a new republican president in power. we have seen seats being filled expeditiously in order to prevent them being filled by a democratic president. i think there are a lot of things that go into the public s feeling the court has become politicized.
very promising. not very hopeful going forward. even though the court didn t rule on the merits of this case and and made it clear in its order that it wasn t reaching the merits that it was ruling on the procedural grounds in upholding the law. it tells us a lot. you know, the the the order by these five justices speaks volumes. and we know that when donald trump appointed the three judges that he appointed to the court, he did so with the notion that he wanted judges that would overturn roe v wade. we have heard justice clarence thomas. we know his opinion. we ve heard from gorsuch. these judges have already made it pretty clear that they believe roe v wade is unconstitutional and that it was a wrong decision and that it should be overturned. so, knowing what we already know, having heard from these judges before, i don t i don t expect roe to have an easy time in the court system. and in fact, we may be looking at 50 years of protection for
hannon didn t cancel it who are participating in it but leaves themselves in devastating legal limbo. hannon is an appointee of george w. bush and he ruled that congress didn t authority the homeland security department to create daca. but hannon also wrote it wouldn t be fair for the program that so many rely on. the u.s. justice department is widely expected to appeal the ruling which could be sent back to the supreme court which previously blocked the trump administration attempt to end the program. the high court didn t rule whether the program was legal. evan perez, cnn, washington. the funeral for haiti s assassinated leader is set for friday. we ve also know that the fbi has begun its own investigation. that s because some of the suspects in the key plot seem to have connection to florida. we get that from matt rivers in
undocumented immigrants to remain in this country is illegal. and they blocked from accepting new advocates. and hundreds protected under the program known as deferred action for childhood arrivals. the emergency action for the judge doesn t cancel the program for dreamers who are participating in it but once again leaves themselves in devastating limbo. he s an appointee of george w. bush and ruled that congress didn t authorize the homeland security department to create daca. but hanna also wrote it wouldn t be fair for the program that so many people rely on. the u.s. justice department is widely expected to appeal the ruling which could be sent back to the supreme court which previously blocked the trump administration attempt to end the program. the high court didn t rule whether the program was legal. evan perez, cnn, washington. meanwhile, the number of