press loves him anyway, may not like him personally and certainly don t like jay carney, but it s in their mind historical that this man win and if there were a third term he d win. it s telling that the press discovered their outrage over a golf became to tiger woods. where is their outrage on benghazi, and it d be interesting if they were curious. the white house didn t release a white house press photographer picture of the tiger woods event. now, you know, they complained that apparently reporters only want to see the president with celebrities. you go on the white house site you can see pictures of him with the chicago bulls, with b.b. king, george clooney, katy perry, will ferrell, the cast of modern family, but there is nothing of this, well, now humiliated former golf star, tiger woods. yes, this is more about
not like him personally and certainly don t like jay carney, but it s in their mind historical that this man win and if there were a third term he d win. it s telling that the press discovered their outrage over a golf became to tiger woods. where is their outrage on benghazi, and it d be interesting if they were curious. the white house didn t release a white house press photographer picture of the tiger woods event. now, you know, they complained that apparently reporters only want to see the president with celebrities. you go on the white house site you can see pictures of him with the chicago bulls, with b.b. king, george clooney, katy perry, will ferrell, the cast of modern family, but there is nothing of this, well, now humiliated former golf star, tiger woods. yes, this is more about
the journal news should not have published the names and addresses. they should not be published. so here is what some of you had to say. new york yankee tweets it is reckless and meritless and puts manyn peril. they made themselves partners with the criminals. don t buy their paper. and one of the one or are two who said yes says all this information is public and everyone has access to it. i say hog wash. shame on them. get out of the mole hole and start talking about. all right, joes and joey. should they have done that? no way. judge jeanine: why not? they are legally possessing a weapon. why should they out someone who is legally win their rights possessing a weapon. so semilune tick i some lunatio their home and try to solve the
couple witnesses. the defense for the first time presented their theory of the case which is pretty explosive. according to the defense basically during the last day of his life they were having a sexual tryst during which he tied her up using rope and he parentally used a knife. and then later on that day they were taking photos of each other? the shower or she was teaing photos of him in the shower and she drops the a camera and according to the defense he links at her and she grabbed the knife and stabs him 27 times and slashes his throat. judge jeanine: so she is upset or he is upset allegedly because she dropped his camera and therefore he comes at her and she attacks them and stabs him in self-defense. but he was shot. does she explain who shot him? that was the million dollars question in the opening in mynts at least mckinley nye opinion. there was no mention of the gud gotten the gun. it was kind of like a last minute effort on the defense s
years ago when the 30 years ago when the laws were written. each one was placed with a little red flag. certainly my colleague had no idea what was going to unfold. take google earth and go right into the driveway and see their car and look at the license plate. what an invasion of privacy. and the heartwrenching stories that i heard from all of the people in my neighboring counties of westchester and rockland made me he pause. i gathered all of my attorneys together. judge jeanine: and said no way. no way. judge jeanine: you know it will go to the courts, right? absolutely. judge jeanine: you are setting it up for an appeal and court action ultimately. gentleman there is a section of the what is it the public officer s law that says if it is an unwarranted invasion of personal property that you don t have to release the information. when they didn t get the additional stuff from you, tim from westchester, were they angry? did they come back at you and say we want it? the