supreme court. i never thought i d say this, but you re only 81! justice kennedy, what are you doing retiring, man? you have a great job where you barely work, you get to wear a robe all day and give your opinions on stuff. that basically is retirement. stick around, at least until we get a new president. six months tops. think about it, the court this week crippled unions and race based gerrymandering might turn conservative. enjoy your gay marriages now because as of august 1st, you re back to being roommates. get the bottom line with rob reiner. talk about your film in a moment. you did play a pivotal role, in fact, in the decision on same-sex marriage based on what you did in california. we were the first group to file a federal lawsuit which led the way to marriage equality and
pursued witnessed. they haven t cross examined witnesses. they took a witness as whatever he or she said as the truth. they didn t subpoena documents that might contest the witnesses. this is what is well known as a whitewash and putting it out there and they may be stuck with it. yeah. very important. no subpoenas. a lot of witnesses refusing to answering questions. thank you both. next, even the white house alarmed by the education secretary shocking television interview. i ve not intentionally visited schools that are underperforming. maybe you should. maybe i should. yes. how could betsy devos have been so unprepared. a report of a russian hit list after an ex spy is poisoned. he s our next guest.
to say that we have seen a red evidence or say we got to get donald trump in there, i don t know that s true. i mean i think they did not like hillary. i also know they kept very good evidence against hillary in their back pocket and didn t release it. why would you end the investigation now? it sounds like there s agreement of where it is. why are you all ending it? two things from what i said last week is we have gone off the rails and now we re a political forum for people to leak information to drive the day s news. we have lost all credibility and we re going to issue probably two different reports. if there s anything we can come together to do to help protect us in 2018, we just had a
what we had up is house republicans put together a report. democrats not consulted. you have to wonder who on that committee from the republicans was consulted. it didn t that congressman rooney, who is on that meeting, didn t seem to be consulted and didn t know the detail offenils report. he certainly didn t. what do you make of that? our report says the following. it says this report shows an agreement with the intelligence community judgment with respect to putin s supposed preference for candidate trump. it says it right there. the chairman repeated this contention a number of times.
with the russians and russians didn t meddle with the intent to help trump win. the second part, i don t know where you re getting that from. the investigation is ending. we are writing our report based on what we heard over the last year and the scores of witnesses we heard. i m not sure where you ve read or where you seen from my committee we have concluded that the russians didn t try to affect our election because it s not saying that. what our reporting is that they didn t try to interfere with the election with the goal of helping trump win. that s what they re saying. does your report conclude that? they meddle but not to help donald trump. i think that it s far more objective than that. first of all, it has not been written completely. we have been wrietsing i as we have going along over the last year. over the next ten days we ll take input from the democratic