development that the iaea is calling a cause for serious concern, deeply troubling. i would say, michael, the fact that they re doing it deliberately, somewhat out in the open, shows that north korea wants the united states to see this. sources are telling us the north koreans are frustrated because they think that they are not high enough on the priority list of president biden s administration, which of course is dealing with the crisis in afghanistan, the stalled iran nuclear deal, not too much escalating conflict with china. north korea wants to be higher up on the list, and yet according to a source speaking to cnn, north korea has actually not responded to several emails sent by the biden administration saying that the emails were not specific enough, that the u.s. didn t list agenda items to try to move the conversation forward from the one deal that was signed between former president trump and kim in singapore. and so certainly a complex diplomatic web to untangle just adding
convicted racketeers. the white house listed in the announcement of these pardons who exactly had arranged for the pardon where, who had lobbied for it. for example in that description we learned the maria butina boyfriend marden that was kellyanne conway who secured that pardon for him. why? for the ponzi schemer guy that was allen dershowitz who said that guy should get out and jeff van drew. but, hey, one of the high profile people trump pardoned the white house didn t list anyone as having arranged for that particular pardon. perhaps they figured any attribution like that would be unnecessary since googling that guy s name they d find anything they needed to know in the form of many, many online pictures of him with jared kushner. jared kushner used to own the new york observer newspaper, this guy who trump pardoned his
decided to pardon her boyfriend. okay, he pardoned former republican congressman convicted on corruption charges, several of them. he pardoned ponzi schemers and convicted racketeers. anybody who had a connection to him or, frankly, who bought one, he just lined them all up. oddly and conveniently for historians of the white house scandals, the white house also listed in the announcement for most of these pardons, who exactly had arranged for the pardon, who lobbied for it. for example, in that description we learned the maria butina boyfriend pardon that was kellyanne conway who secured that pardon for him. why? for the ponzi schemer guy that was allen dershowitz who said that guy should get out and jeff van drew. but, hey, one of the high-profile people trump pardoned, the white house didn t
don t know what level we re in. barr is by all accounts respected. so i think he ll go up to that line. the president we know has always leaned on the line of legality, he crossed it. he did casinos in atlantic city so i think the good fellas reference is apt. the fact you would have someone leave a voicemail is insane. when jonathan listed the names there s one you didn t list, that i m curious about is sean spicer. every day he came in front of the american public and lied to us. we re finding out in the mueller report there are things he said that are contrasted. and we know that sarah sanders hasn t bothered to discuss stuff with us in 85 days. so he s one other name i would like have a turn in the hot lo past presidencies, and presidents who have had altercations or interactions with congress, their co-equal
his and they are running what is a multimillion dollar company. he was tweeting, i guess his previous account was shut down, so he was tweeting with a new account that didn t list his name so he could fly under the radar. he was tweeting at jack, one of the founders of twitter and tweeting also at alexandria ocasio-cortez? absolutely. tweeting his thoughts on pharmaceutical research. once you knew it was martin, which we did, it could not have been more obvious that it was him. nothing has change. ed: what do you know about what the bureau of prisons is doing now. this is not just about an investigation to get to the bottom of it, but they are covering their back side. absolutely. this is considered a very serious offense to have a cell phone on paper. lot of prisoners have it. if they find he has one, he could be in solitary confinement for up until the remainor of his