you re an agent of the fbi or you re running the fbi. this is what the political landscapes had looked like. you had democrats savaging the fbi saying they were on a partisan witch-hunt against hillary clinton. then james comey didn t indict her and then republicans said that the fbi was biased and, of course, talked about loretta lynch and bill clinton s meeting. so then it was the republicans attacking. then james comey released the letter and those same republicans were saying what a great man comey was and how the fbi was doing the right thing and thank god for the fbi. and then the second they started investigating donald trump s the crimes committed by members of donald trump s inner circle from which four have actually been arrested and charge, then suddenly republicans started attacking the fbi. so 18 months, four different attacks from two political parties based on who they re investigating. where do you go if you re an fbi
sean: that suggested, he said no, and nobody knew who the guy was. but again, this is the fbi or special counsel didn t indict for his conversation with a professor, they indicted him for lying under oath. which you know is sean: got to go, jay. sean: stay with us this hour. we have so much ground to cover, it s changing by the minute. we have newt gingrich, sebastian gorka, greg jarrett all here. we want to hear from you. do you think equal justice under the law is at risk? tell us what you think. eras. they re defined by accomplishments. by victories. by those with the resourcefulness, the ingenuity,
if that prosecutor had wanted an indictment, that prosecutor would have had an indictment. tamir rice s mother and the statement that was read was absolutely true. this cuyahoga county prosecutor acted like the defense lawyer. he did what the defense lawyer did. he went out and hired experts that said the officer reacted reasonably. he allowed, if you believe what s being reported, the officers to come in and read statements and not be cross-examined. that s unheard of. when you have a prosecutor wants to go through a dog and pony show and be able to wash his hands of it and say hey, i didn t do it, the grand jury didn t indict that s a complete farce and that s why people are angry. in fact, in california we ve just passed a law that in circumstances like this, you can t go to a grand jury because it s a ruse. grand jury originally was supposed to be a bull work against abuse by prosecutors. it s now become a hand maiden for the prosecutors. i know you have thoughts on this and you
has devolved into is the defendant breathing? sunny is absolutely correct and i know we don t often agree but if that prosecutor had wanted an indictment, that prosecutor would have had an indictment. tamir rice s mother and the statement that was read was absolutely true. this cuyahoga county prosecutor did what the defense lawyer did. he went out and hired aexperts that said the officer reacted reas reasonab reasonably. he allowed the officers to read statements. that s unheard of. when you have a prosecutor wants to go through a dog and pony show and be able to wash his hands of it and say hey, i didn t do it, the grand jury didn t indict that s a complete farce and that s why people are angry. in fact, in california we ve just passed a law that in circumstances like this, you can t go to a grand jury because
justice system would not bring him to justice. so we want to use the civil justice system to bring him to justice to pay for what he did. again, you know this the nation knows this the grand jury came together, didn t indict darren wilson. federal investigation found no evidence that darren wilson acted illegally in the incident with michael brown. so the feds might, you know, dispute your client s claim. i need you to respond to that. sure. well the grand jury i think america also knows the grand jury process was problematic for so many reasons that there aren t very many people who have confidence in the way that process was carried out. as far as the department of justice investigation, you know, that investigation was of a different scope under different burdens of proof in a different system. i think even early on everyone thought that the department of justice investigation, although they were happy to have the department of justice on the ground what the department of justic