all-white jury, female, without a man on the jury. i think those were stacked. the jury did not represent peers. and in the meeting, they did not discuss race at all and the whole world new race was a driving factor. and the second part is by being insensitive to it, they identified culturally with zimmerman. as in saying zimmerman had to do something. well, the something was why would he have to profile him, racially profile him? how would he have to pursue him? why did he object when told me should not pursue him? a man with a gun chasing the boy home. he assumed the boy didn t belong. after he murdered him, the police came, he gave them the gun and walked away for 44 days and now he has the gun back in the holster again. it just does not pass the smell
all reasons, because he wanted to. central to that argument, something fuelled with the controversy surrounding this case t question of race. prosecutor john guy letting it out clearly today. that defendant at the same time was upright walking around preparing, preparing to tell law enforcement why it was he had just profiled, followed, and murdered an unarmed teenager. somebody who wanted to be a police officer, somebody that had called the police numerous times about crime in his neighborhood, someone who had become the neighborhood watch captain, and someone who believed most importantly that it was his right to rid his neighborhood of anyone that he believed didn t belong. he profiled him as someone that was about to commit a crime in
become the neighborhood watch captain, and someone who believed most importantly that it was his right to rid his neighborhood of anyone that he believed didn t belong. he profiled him as someone that was about to commit a crime in his neighborhood and then he acted on it, and that s why we re here. he profiled him. he was never arrested until april, after national outcry, centered mainly on the racial dimension and local decision not to charge zimmerman played out for weeks in marches like this one in new york union square, wearing hoodies like the one he wore the night he was killed. protesters at this marches and
central to that argument with the controversy surrounding this case, the question of race. that defendant at the same time was upright walking around preparing, preparing to tell law enforcement why it was he had just profiled, followed, and murdered an unarmed teenager. somebody who wanted to be a police officer, somebody that had called the police numerous times about crime in his neighborhood, someone who had become the neighborhood watch captain, and someone who believed most importantly that it was his right to rid his neighborhood of anyone that he believed didn t belong. he profiled him as someone that was about to commit a crime in his neighborhood and then he acted on it, and that s why
for a 12-year-old friend. but in the other world, a 28-year-old grown man. somebody who wanted to be a police officer. somebody who had called the police numerous tyimes about crime in his neighborhood. someone who had become the neighborhood watch captain. and someone who believed most importantly that it was his right to rid his neighborhood of anyone that he believed didn t belong. the date was february 26th of last year. trayvon martin was in town with his father tracy martin. they were visiting tracy martin s girlfriend brandy green and her 12-year-old son chad joseph. they lived together in a town home in a gated complex known as the retreat at twin lakes. and on that day, trayvon martin