really see panic out there. i want to be clear about that. i see dread more than i see panic. yeah. and i think you re right about that. i think we have to be careful not to be too optimistic. a number of people have been optimistic in the past and made statements that didn t bear out. i think right now it s not just having the tools but are they going to get used? for example, people who are vaccine willing, the people who have already had two doses, only 30 % of them have had the third dose which we all now realize is the full vaccination. and if you re going to reduce the breakthroughs from delta, and there are over 800 people in our state of minnesota who have died who were fully vax knitted with two doses but not the third. and so we want to get those third doses in people for delta. and right now with omicron, without the third dose, we don t know how many people will only have mild illness versus severe illness hospitalizations. we can talk about masks, but if
collusion there in terms of these people working together and i mean this is really fascinating to me that why wasn t this looked at? you know, during the obama administration or prior and then nothing while hillary clinton is, you know, running for president of the united states? but yet they want to accuse president trump of collusion and his transition team and do a gigantic document and wire grab without really any evidence to support it and they come up with nothing there. well, you know, kimberly, i said at the beginning of this process they should look into the russia question. and i think they have really come up with no substantial evidence. but, consider this, that trump dossier, that, you know, had all these allegations that didn t bear out, one of the things that dossier said was, the russian sources said they had a dossier that had damning information on hillary clinton. one of the questions i would ask senior fbi officials is did you ever pursue that? kimberly: right.
and bret have touched on. all the traditional figures on donald trump s national security team. i think h.r. mcmaster gave a speech and stayed close to the text but it didn t bear out in what was delivered from president trump today. this issue is not isolated just to russia. although russia is the most obvious and sort of head-snapping example. i call it the cognitive dissonance of the trump foreign policy. you re left constantly trying to interpret. the world thinks the foreign policy is whatever trump says it is and they re looking at his twitter feed. here in washington you have people who are still desperate to invest in the idea that there is somebody in charge of this foreign policy other than trump. so you have this built-in tensionion that leads us all to become kremlinologists of the trump white house when it comes to foreign policy. that s the biggest single problem. on which issue today should we say, actually, the written
president clinton s overall job approval rating was up in the 60s. now that his wife is running for president, president obama is not running for re-election, people are a little nostalgic, they see there s bill s wife, for better or worse, former secretary of state, former senator from new york, she s running and they know who she is. it s incumbent upon bernie sanders to try to break through that. but she had favorabilities in 2007 and 2008 and it didn t bear out when african americans went to the polls. and they had the same nostalgia, she was beaten by barack obama. so i wouldn t [ all speak at once ] especially after barack obama won iowa. and started dealing with a lot of these issues. began galvanizing the vote. bottom line, jimmy, does the clinton campaign have something to worry about? no, i think the clinton campaign has a strategy.