Its conclusion. Im david gura. Ill be back at 2 00 3 00 saturday and sunday of next week. You can find me on instagram and twitter at david gura between now and then for the promised conversation about collusion. I turn things over to my colleague, yasmin vossoughian. Hello, im yasmin vossoughian. Family matters. A new tweet from President Trump raising serious questions about his sons 2016 meeting with a russian lawyer. The changing story and how it could impact the mueller probe. Will he or wont he . The trump teams Cliffhanger On Whether the president will speak to the special counsel. A decision think come this week, although weve been saying that for weeks. How that historic meeting could play out. And a red wave. President trump suggesting republicans will Win Big League if they make the mid terms a referendum on him. Do democrats have a clear enough message to counter the president s rhetoric . Lots to cover, he have beeevery. Here we go. The problem here is that now he and his
and we re not asking those questions. we re of the president, though. i think we re assuming the president won t. so if the president won t stand up, these people are the ones who have the responsibility to do it. and we re not asking tough enough questions of these people to figure out what they re doing to protect us going forward. well, they re in such a bind, because the issue is, if russia interfered in 2016 to help elect donald trump, then there is a chance that they re not there legitimately at all. so standing up there ask saying, yep, maybe we got here because a foreign adversary illegally got involved they re saying that they proved there was meddling. didn t affect the ballot boxes. they have to say that, because there s no way to know how much it affected the election. we know that it affected the election. we know that the hacking absolutely. they have never said that it didn t influence the election or that it didn t affect. they have said no, th
ohio, always a swing state, some important county. if you can throw one county into question into suspicion they have worry about the other process. the integrity of the voting. and they accomplished that. pitted people against each other. i want to go back to the integrity of the vote. you seem to be suggesting they could have had an impact on the integrity of the vote. we have no evidence. because we know that they were inside the database these didn t affect anything. had they chose to do that, had they, and that might have been a bridge too far. now we re going from influence to interference. that gets into sovereignty issues. i don t know if the russians are ready to take that kind of swing at the ubs unls yet and interfere in the elections. but this is as close as it comes without flipping a vote. you raise something that touches the viewers lives, social media, facebook and twitter. what should people look out for? how much more skeptical should the viewers be, what can t
ohio, always a swing state, some important county. if you can throw one county into question into suspicion they have worry about the other process. the integrity of the voting. and they accomplished that. pitted people against each other. i want to go back to the integrity of the vote. you seem to be suggesting they could have had an impact on the integrity of the vote. we have no evidence. because we know that they were inside the database these didn t affect anything. had they chose to do that, had they, and that might have been a bridge too far. now we re going from influence to interference. that gets into sovereignty issues. i don t know if the russians are ready to take that kind of swing at the ubs unls yet and interfere in the elections. but this is as close as it comes without flipping a vote. you raise something that touches the viewers lives, social media, facebook and twitter. what should people look out for? how much more skeptical should the viewers be, what can t