didn t even know that they were going to break up. still, one way or another, nathan may have felt he was on trial as much as daniel was. so, in their closing argument the prosecutors had to essentially act as nathan s defense attorneys. one of the prosecutors pointed at him and remarked this is basically a scared little boy who spent that we got home with his grandma cutting the cross off of his bread. i said he was yellow and mustard without the spice. he was a scrawny kid chile could ve taken him in her sleep. but, with daniel william capable of so brutal murder? of someone he barely knew. other jurors would have to make up their minds without hearing a word from daniel. though, when we spoke with him, daniel had a great deal to say about the case against him. no, i m not trying to accuse nathan of murder. i m just trying to find out where was he. but i do have a suspect. coming up
nathan. or less i actually did it. and let s look at the evidence. and, there s that bear fruit. or is that something where you look at them and it just doesn t work, because we want to make sure we got the right person. could you have prosecuted nathan? absolutely. absolutely. i mean, it would have been an easy case. really? absolutely. come in and say he did it, he is the boyfriend anytime you have a stabbing, you mediately look to whoever that person s romantically involved with. so we called in nathan yet again. multiple time. actually? too yes. they finally arrived to the same conclusion the police did that neither ashli nor nathan killed shelley, had to beat daniel. daniel alone. but making a case in court, it might not be so easy. this is one of those cases where circumstances are kind,