maggie were at mosul on june 7th, they would be at the kennels alone, you would not be there, only between the times of 8:49 and 9:02, they show up without a weapon, assuming that they re going to find weapons and ammunition there, commit the crime during the short twindow and travel the same route you do to alameda. that s what you re trying to tell this jury? you got a lot of factors in there, mr. waters. all of which i do not agree with, some of which i do. that s exactly why, john, creighton waters was trying to nail him down on this timeline because he wants it to not make sense to the jury. if alex murdaugh was at the kennels around 8:45 p.m. when the video was extracted from his son s phone and it was made, he left, he was gone by 8:49, what happened in the four or five minutes say? was somebody lurking in the woods? did somebody come around suddenly and decide to kill
for the jurors at the very end. but you ask whether or not there was a hold out? could be. i mean, this is you have a unanimous verdict that needs to come down for this individual to be convicted. he took the stand and tried his best to say i love my family, love my son. look at the way he refers to his wife, maggie, pawpaw instead of paul and margaret. he s trying to personalize this relationship that he had. inherent to all of, this it s very hard to tell for a jury to believe that someone is capable of killing their spouse, their partner and their child. that s inherent. that s their discord that lives with every juror. that s why he took the stand and try to weave in, i m a great father a great husband. i could never have done this. he had answered that question multiple times when asked by his lawyers whether or not hi killed paul and maggie, the same
all right. as i told you earlier you re implying to this jury and me, that was about me hurting maggie and paul, and that s not what that was. what that was was me saying, i know i hurt my brother, my partners, my clients, many of whom i told you i loved all of whom i cared for. and that s what that was when i m talking about how my misdeeds, how i hurt the people worst were the ones i loved the most. i just asked you what you said, correct, mr. murdaugh? you did ask me what i said, but in asking me that, you re putting an implication on there that i am explaining. just asked you what you said.
question they said emphatically no, i did not. neil: he was quite emphatic about that. this is the latest incident of his stating on this i m not lying. i didn t kill them. let s take a look. alex, did you murder maggie? i would never hurt maggie. did you murder paul? i would never hurt paul if i was under the pressure that tear talking about here, i can promise you, i would hurt myself before i would hurt one of them. back with mercedes and ted williams. this was a little different than his argument yesterday. he didn t use words like intentionally today. ted williams, if you re still there. you are. i want to get both of your takes on this. so on that, because you had
at this trial. your words were i got out of there, correct? i believe that s what i said, yes, sir. you also said during your testimony on cross examination that you heard the ones you loved the most, didn t you? i did say that. nothing further. in saying that i want to explain that answer. he just asked me a question about what i said. then i was going to explain why i said it. all right. as i told you earlier, you re implying to this jury and to me that that was me talking about hurting maggie and paul. that s not what that was. what that was is me saying i know i hurt my brother, my