install them in positions that involve election administration. we see that as a litmus test to this aspect of the republican party that the party can t seem to cut loose. this will last long after donald trump, and i think that s what this committee is getting to the bottom of at how dangerous this is and how it can be replicated and happen again, and i expect it to in 2022, 2024, and beyond. and that animates so much of liz cheney and chairman thompson s public sentiment that dealing with trumpism is essential to the committee s mission as anything else. ashley parker, amanda carpenter, kimberly atkins strks tohr, david jolly, thank you so much for starting us off today. when we come back, both houses of congress focused on urgent problem facing millions of women in this country right now. the graphic and dramatic and
of the trump administration and how people think about january 6th and with comments like that she s hoping to impact the way people think about donald trump s own culpability in the violent attack and in the effort to undo a free and fair election and what that does for the justice department is it raises the stakes for them whether they want to acknowledge it or not and if they are investigating any threads and we know they re investigating the final days of the justice department including the actions of jeffrey clark who tried to usurp the power, and they re investigating the violent riot itself. however, if they never address this kind of behavior by a president of the united states the larger question for the american public will be is the justice department a body it can handle that kind of behavior and that can address it and for the swath of the american public possibly getting larger because of liz cheney, can the justice department address the concern that she has raised and
present, but this was not happenstance. this was not just some mob that showed up and things got carried away. this was planned in advance. the information was there for everyone to see. the intelligence was there. the question was why was it not stopped and we re looking forward to the hearing. donnell harvin, someone who warned of a mass casualty, vent and warned one of the hospitals to be ready, who more than just about anyone else that we ve talked to saw this coming. thank you very much for spending some time with us today to talk about your testimony. we are grateful to you. thank you, nicole. senator lindsay graham has told a special grand jury in georgia investigating donald trump s attempts to overturn the 2020 election results that he has no intention of honoring a subpoena. a judge saw it differently and told lindsay graham he does not have a choice. we ll bring you that story next. have a choice. we ll bring you that story next.
donald trump to other republicans. let s talk about roe as a motivator for the democrats roe v. wade your thoughts. is that even possible, is it enough of the motivator do you think? is it enough, it is hard to say, but it is a motivator. if democrats play their cards right, and you have to admit that sometimes on messaging, they have proven last year and a half now to have it together as most voters would expect him to. it s some of the democratic strategist that i ve been talking to. this is something the democrats rested on their laurels on and they know that.
i m making my way forward, my way with verzenio. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio. and tonight s breaking news that is totally not surprising, elon musk is officially trying to pull out of buying twitter. in a new filing to the securities and exchange commission, musk claimed twitter wasn t immaterial bridge of the 44 billion dollar contract. for the last three months, elon musk s twitter ambitions have given him endless media tension, with vague promises of free speech, and vowing to write the wrong that was stopping donald trump from tweeting. but there were signs early on that he never actually wanted the deal to go through. but also isn t it possible to put a deal on hold or even