On the market unchanged, at least from now, since an Emergency Order from the Supreme Court back in april. What does todays decision mean exactly, joining me now is nbc news senior Legal Correspondent Laura Jarrett. Good to have you here. So youve read through it. Speed reader, whats up. Short story is the case is going back to the Supreme Court. Nothing will change as of right now, but things could get tricky depending on what the Supreme Court does with this. All of this started in april when a federal judge in texas blocked access to the pill nationwide, gutting the original approval of the drug that had been on the market, the most commonly used abortion pill, had been approved since 2000. The drug actually has been, again, used widely since that time. The judge actually in the fifth circuit there, got it blocked in full by the Supreme Court back in april. Supreme court said lets just press pause on everything and allow the natural Court Process to play out. That process involves g
one of the conferences, perhaps in september, but this case is going to get docketed for the coming fall. if they do not take it up, what happens? this decision goes into effect, and everything that happened post 2016, getting it by mail, not having to go to a doctor, all of that is wiped away. we re watching the white house, president biden talking about the inflation reduction act, we also have our eyes on the jailhouse in fulton county, georgia. the sheriff says all 19 defendants charged in the election interference case, which presumably includes donald trump will be booked, screened and printed at rice street instead of the courthouse. d.a. fani willis gave everyone until august 25th at noon to voluntarily surrender, meaning they could technically turning themselves in at any point between now and then. the facility is open 24/7. we are on the ground outside of the fulton county jail in case that happens. but what could happen after that? mark meadows who dodged questions an
expand community parks and forests. folks, there s a lot more, you ve heard a lot today, and i m not going to gointo it all, but this law is helping families save thousands of dollars in energy bills through the tax credit and rebates to buy new and efficient electric appliances, weather-ize their homes, install heat pumps, rooftop solar, it s estimated that the consumer is going to save at least $27 billion in electric bills between now and 2030. [ applause ] 2030 [ applause ] and also tax cuts of $7,500 to buy new electric vehicles. i ve worked it out with the european union, and fuel cells made here in america. for the first time we can get a tax credit to buy used electric vehicles, and thanks to the law, new electric vehicles are going
allow the natural court process to play out. that process involves going back down to the fifth circuit, and that s what we have today. the fifth circuit decision finding that judge matthew kacsmaryk in texas got it wrong in part because they waited too long to sue for the original approval, and did get it right as it relates to, remember, they loosened the safety restrictions, you could get the pill by mail. didn t have to go in person and get it, that s the part the fifth issue is taking issue with. the supreme court is the next step after this. correct. the justice department will say this is problematic, we re taking it to the supreme court, and it will be up to the supreme court if they want to hear it or not. they re going to nak that decision in the next few months. how long do theic usually take before they make a decision? sometimes it can take up to a year. they re not in session. we re in the middle of the summer. they meet sometimes for discreet periods in the summe
official duties. and let s also remember, at least with respect to mr. clark, i would anticipate that the d.a. will say his role in the federal government was to handle environmental matters, not election matters, so i think she has several arguments that she can present to demonstrate that they will fall outside of the bounds of the protections that they re seeking through removal. they re going to argue, aren t they, that they were investigating? again, that is something for the secretary of state, who was doing it. it s something for the local district attorney. and, again, whether it s jeffrey clark at doj or it s not the job of the president or the chief of staff to be investigating, if it s a legal matter, that would have been the u.s. attorney in the northern district of georgia. just one other note, march 5th, again, march 4th trial or march 5th trial, march 5th is super tuesday. it s when quite a few states vote, so march 4th trial the next day would be super tuesday.