To confirm you. If not, they might not. Of course, thats improper. Judges should never promise their future votes in exchange for a senators vote for them. If you answer these questions about your views on specific Supreme Court cases or public controversies of the day, youd be showing the opposite of independence from the legislative branch. Politicians can make promises about how theyll vote on issues. Judges, by their very nature of the job, should never promise any outcome. If a nominee answers these questions, it threatens the Judicial Independence. Of course, there may be times where it is appropriate to reconsider certain decisions, especially if more recent opinions have called into question the rational of the original decisions. So, with this in mind, id like to explore the approach that you would take toward Supreme Court precedent. Could you tell us your views on the value of precedent . I think youve already done that. But the you waif you want to ex, go ahead. Have you ev
Buckley: Villains Ball to remember Aaron Wharton a success
leaderlive.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from leaderlive.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
SunLive - Residents demand action over smelly lake - The Bay s News First
sunlive.co.nz - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sunlive.co.nz Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.