Latest Breaking News On - Diane walton - Page 4 : comparemela.com
People in Toronto looking for a good time got Doug Ford instead
blogto.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from blogto.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
that? on the specific measures, jennifer cleary is here. she is more familiar with those aspects of the corporate of the project. there are lots of impacts that are significant but unavoidable. the way to approve the project, given that, is to do the statement of overriding considerations that they outweigh the harm. those are tied to the amount of money generated from the spectators who are going to be here. you have cut a reduction in the estimate for the number of spectators. the money is not going to be there. what are the benefits to the city? that is more of a policy question, but it is something that is required by ceqa. it is enough of an environmental review question that i wanted to point it out. supervisor campos: thank you. supervisor avalos: a follow-up. if you could amplify your statement about the change we have seen in the number of spectator and supply vessels that were in the d-eir? you mentioned we would have to report back to the numbers of the earlier
supervisor avalos: have you seen other estimates of vessels on the bay that you feel are more accurate? i am not going to address the accuracy of either set of estimates. the draft eir had a set of estimates. the final eir had another which was 80% lower. i do not have a crystal ball to know what estimates will be accurate here. supervisor avalos: you are touching upon one of the things that has been my big concern from the get go about the america s cup. september of 2010, we first had a term sheet agreement that was a pre agreement. already, there was a economic analysis which showed there would be $1.40 billion of economic activity, huge benefits, jobs that are available. it seemed like a great thing, moving down the way to providing a great deal of benefits to the bay area. i did not support the original agreement to begin with, because i felt it was too good to be true. we had the term sheet come before us again in december of that year. as chair of the budget committe
what the nature and degree of the impacts are going to be. some of the planning department memos in response to the appeal say the conclusion that it is significant has not changed. that is a categorical determination. it is not a degree determination. the question you asked us what is the degree of impact? what is the severity of the impact? that is unknown on a host of details where this language is included. supervisor campos: this letter talks about mitigation. it talks about monitoring. it talks about restoration s that need to take place. it focuses specifically on the municipal and transportation agency in the port of san francisco. it talks about how you are talking about two agencies that are already facing their own financial to lounges. you have a budget deficit within the mta. you have other challenges the board of cent the port of san francisco has. the idea that becomes more challenging. can you provide more detail on that? on the specific measures, jenn
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.