occasionally we do. no, we don t. charles and diana were fundamentally incompatible. they were like chalk and cheese. the age gap was problem make the. dinias was 24 and charles was 36. he was an older 36. just because you re growing up knowing you ll eventually be the king of england. she is absolutely pure 20th century woman, and he is fundamental 19th century man. he s super into his water colors and archaeology and history. and she loves dancing. she s full of energy and she s full of life. the only commonality existing between them was william and harry and the children and inevitably tensions grew. diana did feel that she wasn t getting enough attention from charles. we have to remember that diana grew up in a broken family. she wanted this close tight-knit
when you analyze the two different affairs there s a huge difference. charles was rejecting diana because he loved somebody else. diana was never really rejecting charles. she was just desperate to be loved. for princess diana it was the realization of her worst fear because she had always suspected that camila was her husband s great love. diana was at a really low end. there was even a moment when she took a pen knife and cut herself. her bulimia became very intense. they were in vancouver, and they were touring this exhibition. diana sort of moved close to charles and sort of touched his arm and then she started to slide down to the floor and she fainted. the police took the whole thick very seriously.
shook hands with the patients and myself. such as the aids stigma that people in the new ward were afraid to be seen and photographed with the prinsz. she agreed to a still photograph and then only with his back to the camera. the sight of her shaking hands with somebody who had hands in the 1980s was extraordinary. that picture went around the world, and it immediately busted the myth that you could transmit aids via human touch. it was really one of the most pivotal moments in her life. it showed her that she had the power to make a difference. diana realized the power of her royal platform, and i think she was at the forefront of this new kind of celebrity, philanthropy.
camilla s not sorry. she s not even pretending to be sorry. i cried like i ve never cried before. it was seven years of pent up coming out. when i woke up i felt a shift. i said what i felt. diana s decision to confront camilla was sort of a breakthrough for her. from this point on, diana becomes increasingly disillusioned with the sham that is her marriage. she is about to take control of her own story. marriage offers civility. here you have her husband the future king of england in love with someone else. she was like a tinder box waiting to explode. isn t it normal to feel angry and want to change a situation that is hurting you? this was her going totally
ranger. the press were calling her disco di and she was perceived as being frivolous. diana had an epiphany. she said i might be young but i can t act the way other people do, and it really set her on a separate path. most of her public engagements had been about supporting prince charles and his work and she starting to do things on her own right. she chose things that were on the margins that traditionally the royals shied away, from people dispossessed by society, people who had been neglected. she wanted to help people who were marginal bicorized because as she sawed to me parks truckers i can do this, because i m one of them. she understood what it was like to be rejected. it was a dynamic in her marriage, the fact that her mother left her, feelings of being rejected or abandoned were