the issue is this is people speaking out. wh wh that, to me is the sort of the fundamental question. and it truly is , i thinlyk, y censorship by surrogate, an attack on the first amendment and oun thr right to speak, whin i always say the rights wede hae under the first amendment,f yo the most important one is your right to talk, because iftk you can t talk, you can t shareo you can t talk, you can t shareo your government, you don t have freedom.th that s the most freefundamental right most ththe press, that is the most fundamental right we have. and that s exactly the righte and that the fbi was trying to restrict. and miranda, speaking offormr that, your wrath from former twitter. twit a on that whole first amendment thing. gain, we again and again, we u the speech of a small number of abusive users drive away, countless others unrestricted coununess others unrestricted results in less speech, noret more . and it was our job interest inec safety to try to strike an appropriath
become a hub to nation security. again, i want to thank my fellow leaders. i think the bottom line is we are leaving chicago with a nato alliance that is stronger, more capable and more ready for the future. as a result, each of our nations, the united states included, is more secure and we re in a stronger position to advance the security and prosperity and pree dfreedom th seek around the world. with that i m going to take a couple questions and i m going to start with julie pace of a.p. there she is. thank you, mr. president. you ve said the u.s. can t deal with afghanistan without also talking about pakistan. and yet there s been little public discussion at this summit about pakistan s role in ending the war. in your talks with president zardari today, did you make any progress in reopening the supply lines, and if the larger tensions with pakistan can t be resolved, does that put the nato coalitions and gains at risk?