affirmative action. the group with fair admission the group that brought that case. freedom trust and the scathe foundation and bradley foundation were behind the billboards scaring people away from voting three years ago and $3 million from the dark money atm of the right and the koch and devos families among the major contributors. the loan servicer in the student loan case didn t want to be involved in it. one employee of the organization called mohia said are we the bad guys. they weren t involved in it. again, nobody was a plaintiff. and in adjudicating this is what justice kagen said. they have no business deciding and it blows through constitutional guardrails intended to keep courts acting like courts instead of like legislators. you re thoughts, dean, on the fact that this supreme court majority seems to be acting not
secretaries serving two different presidents decided to use their heroes act authority, the 2003 law in question here, the first suspended loan repayments and interest accrual for all federally held student loans. she s speaking, of course, of secretary betsy do voss who served in the trump administration. how do you draw the distinction between what devos did and what the department of education did here under president biden? , why and thank you for yes, and thank you for having me. the distinction i would draw between secretary devos temporarily waiving loan repayments and the accrual of interest on those loans and what the secretary did here in a student loan cancelation is that a cancelation is a far more extreme measure. in fact, chief justice roberts mentioned in his opinion that the secretary s plan has modified the cited provisions only in the same sense that the french revolution modified the
devos. kids will suffer in the next generation because of what this one woman did and her political aspirations and her supporting her desperate attempt to support politics. jessica: okay. jesse, take us home, politely. [laughter] jesse: i ve got nothing polite. you know where she is right now? ukraine. jessica: yeah. jesse: why is randi weingarten are in ukraine for the third time? jessica: it s beautiful this time of year. jesse: that s what you ve got? jessica: i am leading the block, i don t have to defend it. jesse: you should! i just think lives of tiktok is going to be out of a job. we have shown these undercover videos where they go inside these classrooms and you have administrators admitting they
has been controlled by the devos family, the betsy devo family that the whole world knows who she is i ve heard of her in this last round wher they were nominating their attorney general secretary o state, the devos candidate lost to the trump candidates and so it is - we now have a republican chair here in michigan - kristina karamo. is as trumpian as it gets. do you think the republican primary will help tomorrow trump would still have a hol on that? i think so. another potential candidate i call him, a fellow governor, ron desantis recently made som comments or he made clear this week i should say that supporting ukraine is not vital national interest to the united states. what do you say to that? i am not an expert on geopolitics. i will say this. i think it s really dangerou when politicians are using language that is coming out of the kremlin. there s no question that