Additional Public Comment . Open this item . Okay Public Comment is closed. And opening up to commissioners commissioner antonini. This as a very good project and for my purposes consider sacramento a designation a number of stores and restaurant and other things i will go to sacramento for i dont live neighborhood nor is my business in that neighborhood that in and of itself it sounds like a very good improvement restoring the windows and making that assessable to two different ways it will make a more attractive frontage and potential for quite a few of the jobs and i witnessed this all the time where people i know will drive out of San Francisco for a particular product or service and saving 2 thousand people if driving to palo alto is good in keeping tax revenue in San Francisco so i think this is a very good and their also making street tree improvements and staff has already opined this is a retail are accessory so i think i mean there was one speaker that brought that up if that
Is in their parties primaries. If you are seen as being unorthodox can, as you were saying, or as Party Loyalists would say unfaithful to the partys positions on these issues, you tend to get Interest Groups who come after you with funds. They will often mount a primary opponent that makes your life difficult. And there are all kinds of institutions now in place and resources in place that really keep the parties politicians towing a very ideological line on these issues. So more and more thats become quite unusual in american politics. Host all right. Subtitle, how issue ownership drives and distorts american politics. Whats the distortion . Guest the distortion that i find in the book is the theme with which weve led our conversation, which is that i find lots of instances where the parties actually pay less attention to what the public wants on the issues they own than on the issues they dont. So, again, the Affordable Care act is a great example. This is a policy that is pursued he
Time. The presiding officer without objection. Ms. Cantwell thank you mr. President. I thank the senator from north dakota. I know were going to be going back and forth on this issue and that we have speakers coming later this morning and were going to have time divided but i appreciate the senator of north dakota allowing us to join in the debate this morning and make a few mountains. And i do want to say i appreciate the senator from north dakotas hard work on the Energy Committee in general and i look forward to working with him on many Energy Policies. He and i have worked together on a couple of different agricultural issues, and i certainly appreciate his due diligence. But needless to say i dont agree with the process of moving forward with this motion to proceed to the Keystone Pipeline bill. Many of my colleagues here are going to be coming down, talking about the issues. Two of my colleagues including the senators from utah and arkansas along with the senator of north dakota,
Caucus the chairman of the finance committee somebody that certainly understands tax policy and fiscal policy for this country extremely well. And this legislation that were considering is a jobs bill. Its about energy. Its about jobs. Its about Economic Growth. Its about National Security. But for somebody like the senator from utah whos working on reforming our tax code and how we can stimulate Economic Growth in this country id like to turn to him here right at the outset and say as somebody that truly understands how our economy works and how we have to build a Good Business climate in this country and we have to empower the development of of infrastructure roads and rail, pipelines and transmission lines, as part of building an Energy Policy that will truly make this energy this Nation Energy secure. Id like to turn to him and ask him if he would take a few minutes and address not only this project on its on the broad basis of its merits but particularly some of the economic aspec
Is a question for the leviathan and the smart on the go lets go for the bc there are thousand of reasons people are grabbing glance around the major cities theres always an official who was involved when it comes to development. This official games profits from lands and earns big money. He should be stopped he should be considered as legally earned money the local star beau coup participants to them the brushes. In two thousand the two City Administration concluded agreements with when users who are willing to transfer these land plots to the state costs the Capital Administration was held by the suction kiama at the time the room is overstated whats your pick him up if he thought it was it due to the us although local authorities about their needs emily and that is what facilities and where are they going to build in the next ten years twenty thousand hectares were together throughout the country when we started to check those lands. The turnout than on the fifteen thousand actors ar