Authorities deliver on their ommitment, which we have every reason to believe they will. Gentleman in the middle . Chris giles from the financial times. Madam, the i. M. F. Regularly gives other countries advice and cause for a plan b, most recently asking the e. B. Foment give effort on things. Is it time now for a plan b. For the i. M. F. Where you circumvent the u. S. . You know, i dont think our institution should move to plan until we have full certainty that plan a is definitely dead. Im not prepared to declare that that the point. And i very strongly hope that he results of the institution, the pressure brought to bear by the members of this institution on all those who have not yet ratifying will deliver fruit in the not too distant future. Ok. Going to say stay in the middle. Lady in the white jacket. Thank you. My question is about japan. Your projection with lower with 0. 3. And do you still believe in economics . If so, why . Especially third al lowe since not working well,
Helping them find a way to connect and share their views. Global Internet Freedom programs, u. S. International broadcasting, and support for human rights activists are all fundamental components of our countrys longstanding efforts to remote democracy overseas. For more than 50 years, the United States has had an unwavering commitment to promote freedom of information in the world. Our work in cuba is no different than our efforts to promote freedom of expression and uncensored access to information in the ukraine, russia, belarus, iran, china, or north korea. It should be noted that in the bill there is 76 billion set aside to promote global Internet Freedom and democracy in closed societies like cuba, where the regime allows no independent press and limits access to the internet. It also states that with respect to the provision of assistance for democracy, human rights, and government activities, these programs shall not be subject to the prior approval by the government of any for
You come at a time when usaid is making headlines for doing nothing more than the job you were appointed to do. That we say to the record, when it comes to the issue of cuba or your work in any closed society, i do not believe usaids actions, as clearly articulated in your Mission Statement to promote resilient democratic societies that are able to realize their potential, are in any way a cockamamie idea. I believe it is exactly what the people of cuba, iran, burma, belarus, north korea, and other authoritarian nations need to help them communicate with each other. To help them achieve the usaids stated mission of a free, peaceful, and selfreliant society with an effective, legitimate governmen. So i commend you for helping people have a less control platform to talk to each other, helping them find a way to connect and share their views. Global Internet Freedom programs , u. S. International broadcasting, and support for human rights activists are all fundamental components of our co
I do not believe that usaids action that were quoted to promote quote democratic societies that are able to realize their potential are in anyway a bad idea. I believe it is what the people of cuba, iran, burma, north korea and other nations need to help communicate with each other and help them achieve usaids stated mission of a quote free, peace full and self Reliant Society with an effective government. I commend you for giving people a less controlled platform to talk to each other, for helping them find a way to connect and share views. Global Internet Freedom programs and use broadcasting for support were human rights activist are components for our longstanding efforts to promote democracy over states. For 50 years, the United States has had an unwavering commit to provide free information around the world. Our work in cuba is no different than promoting this in ukraine, iran, russia, china or north korea. It should be noted there is 76 million set aside to promote global Intern
Googles super secretive Research Group meets with the fda. Could bionic contact lenses be in our future . The u. S. Supreme court will hear aereo versus the networks. The Parent Companies of Major Networks say that area out aereo is stealing their content without paying for it. They use tiny antennas to send out signals online. Broadcasters are threatening to convert to cable if it does not shut down. The ceo gave us a statement saying that they remain unwavering in their confidence that the Technology Fall squarely within the law. He is not the only one who is confident. I caught up with news corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch at an event in yet mountain view. What is the latest on aereo . We are fine. We will win he says. Jon erlichman, our senior west coast correspondent and paul kedrosky, our bloomberg contributing editor join us from san diego. What is the significance of it getting to the level of the Supreme Court . Everybody will get their day in court. I think you know what everyon