I just feel like, throughout this process, i very much like peter and mara, by the way. They are great people. Ive tried to extend and accommodate as much as i humanly could, foz will not timeframe. As leslie pointed out, i just want to be clear, i specifically chose to record that easement on their side in order to preserve as much light as possible and as much distance as possible. I completely relate to the fact that, you know, they have enjoyed the view for a long time of this empty place, in a lot. I get that. It had been fortunate it had been empty and vacant for so long. I would really love to build this modest singlefamily home. Dot to in our view fits perfectly within the powdered of this neighborhood pattern of this neighborhood. We are going to stay in San Francisco, we are going to raise a family. We both work here, my fiance and i do. We are hopefully going to bring my parents and even her folks to live in the existing house and create more housing for elderly folks, as we
Convinced. I share the same opinion as you. I work a little bit always at the first block of fillmore. This is a small street, large alleyway. All of the lots are small. All of the houses are originally built because of the size of the lots. Also, i agree, the developers being more than gracious by literally placing the easement, and sharing it with a neighbor. I am in support. A couple of questions for staff. Do you know whether the dr was filed based on the original scheme, they rather than the revised scheme . I think there is a big difference. Right. Yeah, i would defer to the project sponsor on that. Though dr was taken on the site permit plans. We have revised it based on discussions with our team. Based on that that is the plans that you have before you. Has a revised set been provided to the dr requester . Yeah, it has been provided. Okay, maam. It is provided as part of the packet which is uploaded to the website and is public information. Second. Maam, you are out of order. U
I have aging parents, my dad is 75, my mom is 74. We want to raise a family with my fiance. I just feel like, throughout this process, i very much like peter and mara, by the way. They are great people. Ive tried to extend and accommodate as much as i humanly could, foz will not timeframe. As leslie pointed out, i just want to be clear, i specifically chose to record that easement on their side in order to preserve as much light as possible and as much distance as possible. I completely relate to the fact that, you know, they have enjoyed the view for a long time of this empty place, in a lot. I get that. It had been fortunate it had been empty and vacant for so long. I would really love to build this modest singlefamily home. Dot to in our view fits perfectly within the powdered of this neighborhood pattern of this neighborhood. We are going to stay in San Francisco, we are going to raise a family. We both work here, my fiance and i do. We are hopefully going to bring my parents and e
That is hopefully reflecting what we are saying here. In the spirit of what we, all as a group have to talk about. In accordance to the roof deck policy which we have not yet approved. That is in flux, i would suggest that condition to what commissioner moore said, the unoccupied area of the roof be noted in the drawing. And it reflects the past not doing three years. You are okay with the placement of the roof deck . You just want to make sure that the other portion of the roof is clearly designated or delineated as non occupied . Correct. Okay. I will take dr. Approve the project as is to make sure that the portion of the roof that doesnt have a roof deck is clearly delineated that it is not to be occupied. Very good. If there is nothing further there is a motion to be seconded to take dr and approve the project as has been revised. Noting on the plans that the area of the roof deck the area of the roof that is unoccupied. On that motion. [roll call] so moved, commissioners. That mot
Building things, i would like to have that recorded as the roof area that we are proving today. I would like to state again that the street itself does not have roof decks. We are basically adding something, which i believe is appropriate yet i would like that to be modified in a manner that theres an open floor plan. Any other questions . No, that is all. One quick question, what commissioner more is indicating, would it fit our new roof deck policy . I moved to take 2018009355drp and establish dr and approve the project. As revised. I think its an overstatement commissioner richards to say we have a roof deck policy. The commission has consistently pushed for criteria which are being expressed on this particular roof design. We are working on a roof policy, that is hopefully reflecting what we are saying here. In the spirit of what we, all as a group have to talk about. In accordance to the roof deck policy which we have not yet approved. That is in flux, i would suggest that conditi