A Framework For Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems Deterrence – Analysis eurasiareview.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from eurasiareview.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
according to a recent survey, many of the a bomb survivors don t feel that there will be a meaningful progress, if you like, and the terms of discernment of nuclear weapons after this g7 some it. why do you think there is so much scepticism bear. you think there is so much scepticism bear. because of the heightened scepticism bear. because of the heightened threats scepticism bear. because of the heightened threats in scepticism bear. because of the heightened threats in europe i heightened threats in europe and east asia. there are increased discussions about nuclear, some of them based on the deterrence theory rather than band, rather than looking straight for the actual abolition. so more and more, also japan is not finding the treaty. so those things are creating a lot of scepticism. as you say, there have been arguments that nuclear
it is a danger to this country. now we re going through a new cycle. and trump is talking about kim jung-un and his private negotiations with him, which are traumatizing his national security team. and trump literally says about kim jung-un and his missiles, well, if he shoots, he shoots. if he shoots he shoots. the whole premise of deterrence theory is it is unthinkable to shoot. that we now have putin talking about it. but here is trump kind of saying, if he shoots he shoots, well, we ll destroy him. i mean, my god, you listen to that and it is the casualness.
Today, the Department of Defense released the unclassified National Defense Strategy (NDS), Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), and Missile Defense Review (MDR).
potential to dramatically alter the situation. not clear what we would do in response to that. we haven t signaled any clear path of retaliation, which i think is a mistake. one of the mistakes we ve consistently made is failing to make clear to putin the scale of the down side to is escalation. we use sanctions as a deterrent. it didn t work. we re not now saying anything about what would happen if he resorts to a nuclear weapon and gives him the impression that we wouldn t do much except more sanctions. that s where deterrence theory not to go. you have to deter him from doing that and right now i don t think we re doing enough. bill: austin said yesterday there are is range of options before the president that would give him adequate choices. what those are remains to be seen. it is good to have you on