weinstein, i consulted briefly on one of the e-mail issues in that case, had the main accusers, accusation against him dismissed today. evidence came out that a detective suppressed that the main accuser told a friend that she had willingly and voluntarily engaged in oral seg with harvey weinstein to be cast in a role, having presumably testified under oath that he forced her to have sex. women would die. they lie for economic reasons. i agree that most women tell the truth but most isn t enough to convict somebody. you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. secretary in this casely sonny is a good lawyer, she is correct. but if you have elements that cast doubt on the word of the woman, then corroboration certainly helps strengthen the case. tucker: so you re allowed to doubt a womaned word, that s still legal. is this a sex-selective
accusers, accusation against him dismissed today. evidence came out that a detective suppressed that the main accuser told a friend that she had willingly and voluntarily engaged in oral sex with harvey weinstein to be cast in a role, having presumably testified under oath that he forced her to have sex. women do lie. they lie for economic reasons. i agree that most women tell the truth but most isn t enough to convict somebody. you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. technically, sonny is a good lawyer, she is correct. but if you have elements that cast doubt on the word of the woman, then corroboration certainly helps strengthen the case. tucker: so you re allowed to doubt a woman s word, that s still legal. is this a sex-selective question? t