have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corru corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, it it says: so he takes a brib bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set f forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, d does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did joc jack the r ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed positively to th
have told you in past, h d two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed
have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contribu
members voted against bills they support, same cast from january, who tried to derail the speaker. what point are they trying to make, if any? let s find out. joining us is speaker of the house, kevin mccarthy, from the great state of california. thank you for joining us, mr. speaker. why? why are these members voting with democrats to keep gop bills from coming up for a vote? speaker mccarthy: i m not sure. trey, we missed you serving with us in congress. republicans control the house by five votes, democrats control senate and white house. less than 5% of members voted with democrats to deny us from bringing conservative bills to the floor. if you can t bring floors to the bill, you are turning the house over to democrats. that is why we ve got to come together, we have no choice but to be able to have that conservative voice for the american people. we have been successful from the parents bill of rights, from the investigation, from passing a bill to make us energy inde
hey, everyone. it s 4:00 in new york. i m in for nicole wallace. special counsel jack smith is a prosecutor that stays out of the spotlight. he prefers to speak through his fiings. that s why his laltest brief in the federal election case merits our attention. over the weekend, the justice department responded to trump s claims that he is immune from prosecution. what he did was within the scope of his duties as president of the united states. it s an argument that trump was taking to the courts in order to get the whole election case dismissed. the special counsel is speaking to the court. let s be honest. he s also speaking to any of us who care about the health of our democracy. prosecutors acknowledge the fact we re dealing with an unprecedented situation. for the first time in our nation s history, a grand jury charged a former president of committing crimes while in office to overturn an election he lost. in response the defendant claims to protect the institution of th