he was born in 1827, he was a minister in the church, he served as a chaplain for the union army during the american civil war. then in 1870, he was elected by the mississippi legislature to the united states senate believe it or not. the first ever black man stand to either body of congress in our country s history, was him. it is sort of hard to imagine that today, mississippi was the first day to actually send a black man to the, congress but they did. and they did it all the way back in 1870. and then believe it or not, an 1875, they did it again. the mississippi legislator said blanche k bruise to the united states senate. that s the second time ever a black man was elected to that chamber. and you re probably wondering why or how that happened. the reason mississippi was actually able to make history like that all the way back in the 1870s was because of reconstruction. after the civil war, mississippi was forced to adopt a bunch of new laws and franchising the states n
ironic it is that your the justice says when they re nominate and they re going through the confirmation process, they say we don t like to comment on hypothetical cases. and it was watching the opening segment and it was like no one is aggrieved, there actually is no case here, but they have no problem making decisions about hypothetical cases if, that, say someone one day was aggrieved. that s a great point. they re-found their ability to weigh in on high post. exactly. great show as always, my friend. great to see, you enjoy the rest of your evening off. and thanks to at-home for joining us tonight. alex has the night off. i m filling in for her this evening. but we begin tonight with the supreme court. and his name was jerome rebels he was born in 1827 he was a minister in the amy church. he served as a chaplain for the army for the american civil war. and in 1870, he was elected by the mississippi legislator to the united states senate believe it or not. the firs
ill meal address and his company at the time, which was publicly available, i think the chances are more likely that someone uses identity. if he was going to do the fraudulent way, harassing way, why would he do so under his own identity? it just doesn t make sense. so, kristen wagner, the president of the conservative christian legal nonprofit alliance defending freedom and the lawyer who argued this before the supreme court responded to your reporting on a press call earlier. she called it untrue. i wanna play for here is just a part of what she had to say. listen. lori received a website request, design request, from a third party. even colorado agreed. it is not her responsibility, nor is she able to do background checks on those who she is receiving these background checks are from. colorado s told her she declines in any way, it requests like this, she puts herself in the crosshairs of this law. so, again, it s undisputed that
it was argued at the supreme court because the web design community were discussing it in the context of their own work and what it might mean. so, given the fact that this is an inquiry made with his real name, real phone number, real ill meal address and his company at the time, which was publicly available, i think the chances are more likely that someone uses identity. if he was going to do the fraudulent way, harassing way, why would he do so under his own identity? it just doesn t make sense. so, kristen wagner, the president of the conservative christian legal nonprofit alliance defending freedom and the lawyer who argued this before the supreme court responded to your reporting on a press call earlier. she called it untrue. i wanna play for here is just a part of what she had to say. listen. lori received a website request, design request, from a third party. even colorado agreed. it is not her responsibility, nor is she able to do background checks on those who she is rece