Constitution of the United States and that of the state of california and all of the laws that come there from thats a big responsibility and you cant come back later and say well, because i didnt directly handle this request im not responsible is just a complete denial of anything you know about proper management and acceptance of responsibility. And now we find out that mr. Rahaim has a direct report, the individual who was responsible to see that all those other people answer this request properly. And do any of you honestly believe that throughout this entire process from beginning to end mr. Rahaim was not kept informed of everything going on . And that he had every opportunity if he wanted to Say Something to show up at any of these hearings so he was not denied due process or notice or anything else unless you want to assume that every single employee tells him nothing and if thats the case hes got bigger problems than this. Okay. I call the motion. All in favor . Aye. Opposed .
Interfered with the course of justice and thats what the Planning Department did and i have no reason to believe that they are so ignorant of what they do that they didnt realize that was exactly what they were doing. Now as far as finding mr. Rahaim responsible he is responsible. No ifs, ands or buts. If youre the head of the department and accept 200,000, whatever salary you get plus another 40 in benefits and take an oath in defend the constitution of the United States and that of the state of california and all of the laws that come there from thats a big responsibility and you cant come back later and say well, because i didnt directly handle this request im not responsible is just a complete denial of anything you know about proper management and acceptance of responsibility. And now we find out that mr. Rahaim has a direct report, the individual who was responsible to see that all those other people answer this request properly. And do any of you honestly believe that throughout
A signal to other city departments that they had better start complying with the sunshine ordinance. To that extent it should be a unanimous four person vote to up hold your motion tonight sir. I really, really am disturbed by mr. Pilpels behavior. Ill be amending that complaint and i am hoping commissioner keane that you will have the wherewithal during the Agenda Setting topic tonight to recommend that a public hearing on mr. Pilpels sia violation be expedited and put on your next commission meeting. Any other Public Comment . Commissioners, directors of San Francisco and [inaudible] open government and i would like to say will. Back to my general comment and regarding the things with the new members. Frankly i think asking a question what good is it going to do to do this is rather transparent, but what its supposed to do is get people to follow the law. They all have a responsibility. They all know what the law s they have done it for a dozen years yet we repeatedly get in situatio
Narrows at the point where the driveway comes out to people have to go an extra difference where the street narrows its a difficult turn and the preservation of a human scale in the city with the intention of fulsome street as grand boulevard theres a tension between grand boulevard and our western selma plan that preserving the small streets theyre part of town with if i parks and provide respite for residential neighborhoods and bicyclists and our preservation of residential enclaves preserves all the things we have walkability and vicinitycy and Pedestrian Safety but we need time to work this out democratically and ralph street is not a Service Corridor and shouldnt be treated as one thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. Hi, im Jerry Jessica a homeownership on ralph street and thank you for hearing our comments im in favor of this development and i and i appreciate how the developers have worked with the community and im asking for a continuance because of the concerns about the drive
Town hall meeting i was in at the scene i ask the lgbt representatives how much are you going to pay us for thank you for the opportunity our lives upside down and when after repeated the response from lgbt was theres no lay that says we have to do that. My partner and i are sdanld with hiv and aids we cant work we know people that are suffering from kidney failure and skansz cancer and lgbt has demonstrated a lack of good well and good faith and moral obligation to the neighborhood tenants who lives and health had been permanently effected by this development anticipated noise occasions and excavation and pile driving and toxic air quality resulting from the construction will have a Significant Impact on us and our health and our daily lives and this Construction Activity may require us to move out of our home and potentially out of San Francisco a devastating blow to our lives with and aids due to a loss of medical services we have to stay within the city limits before allowing lgbt