Ill support. Let me followup i stirred up a conversation this morning about that i understand now the difficulties and challenges with growth and how easy it is to go floor by floor and the structure of the building if you have the ability to enforce it you could go by percentage it would open up the use of the building some are cool you see airbnb not pdrs but they use the building vertically and stacked up in the building split i think there could be interesting and cool conversions if it were by conversions and not by floor. If i could speak it is for a manufacturing space weve reviewed and approved projects with design and manufacturing so it is looking at how do you make those spaces function correctly this is going to pure office uses not as officers asia accessory to other manufacturing use so ill say the historic tools are more effective. I understand something was pointed out how we may be the logical way it effects other decisions in the centralize corridor with other buildin
Hill periodically. We look at this site, we dont see it a icon i can except the chain link fence refuse collecting eyesore, thats in that sense. It is icon i can. Ive been astounded at the [speaker not understood] sitting there 17 years doing nothing. And we have this optimum use you can do with that site. If you scroll down the uses, its not a tax cutter [speaker not understood]. It doesnt work with multifamily [speaker not understood] apartment billion, as a special need development as weve been involved in district 3, it did you not work for a lot of reasons and access in financing. As a park it would be a disaster. By the way, theres a parka above it which willv not include a view of the project. [speaker not understood] detached solution which we support. An overarching point i would like to make is when i read the controllers general fund report which shows shortfall of 66, 133, 2 82 and 339 Million Dollars in the general fund each year going from 14 and 15, in project will gener
I currently visit coyt tower quite frequently and as a resident and visiting there often, staring at the current fence and the state where it is now has not been the most esthetically thing ive seen. So, after reviewing some of the plans and the project, decided to see that something positive will be done with the Current Space that its in right now. So, thank you. Good evening, my name is john stewart. Im a neighbor, immediate neighbor about a block away. My day job involves managing and developing mostly affordable mixed use housing including north beach place on bay street. My wife and i walk up Telegraph Hill periodically. We look at this site, we dont see it a icon i can except the chain link fence refuse collecting eyesore, thats in that sense. It is icon i can. Ive been astounded at the [speaker not understood] sitting there 17 years doing nothing. And we have this optimum use you can do with that site. If you scroll down the uses, its not a tax cutter [speaker not understood].
Future. Sxhoifksz if we dont set criteria i think dont go to sooner or later makes sense i wasnt aware when a project came to make changes around until the gentleman said im still new at this 6 months is too late maybe january. Sorry. It sounds like early after the first of the year january or february. Check back in. Okay. Okay anything else okay. Thank you commissioners that will place you on item 10 for case 2014 Office Conversion controls and landmark buildings to the planning code amendment. Good evening, commissioners steve with the Department Staff conversation around pdr has it relates to landmark buildings in the g districts this is a legislation promoted by supervisor cohens office im going to turn it over to andrea if a supervisor cohens office to pertain the details of the legislation and foul with relevant details that are important and be here to answer questions. Thats correct steve from supervisor cohens office i know youve had a long day ill be brief as this item allow
Exemption of an existing building and construction of up to six new units. These are classes he of project the state has determined do not ray the risk of environmental i patctiontion. The appellants have the burden of demonstrating otherwise. You need to show substantial evident the cause will be cowed by impacts and impacts will be [speaker not understood] unsubstantiated opinion or simple changes in views dont cut it. That is largely what the appellant has presented. They claim there will be a million deliveries. Thats based on the vehicle applies to construction vehicles. It does not, conconstruction Utility Vehicle are tempt between the late lin ip of what the appellant estimates, something on the order of 6 to 9 trucks each day over a period of 3 to 4 months of excavation of concrete pouring. The city feudctionv [speaker not understood] do not have significant impacts. The same has to be true for a [speaker not understood] that said we have put considerable effort into the conven