Former GOP representative Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezinski interview newsmakers, politicians and pundits about the issues of the day. Jonathan, were probably going to get swept in like three when we get divisional playoffs. So, i mean, but, listen, it was a fun summer. Mika, why dont we go to the news. In an interview last night President Trumps lawyer said special Counsel Robert Mueller will personally have a lot to answer for just hours after they rejected muellers reported latest offer to get a Sit Down Interview with the president. Trumps legal team said they have made the counteroffer listing their conditions for access to the president who is a subject in the wideranging investigation of russian interference in the 2016 election. Trumps attorneys also publicly voiced their desire for the probe to end. Within the next three weeks and suggested that mueller would be violating doj policies, if it does not end. Dont have an internal deadline. We are moving. I use the phrase, expedi
Washington this is the ingraham angle. You are looking at a live shot of the white house President Trump concludes his first state dinner expecting the departure of the first french president and his wife. So much for the myth trumps americas first policy means isolating from entertaining and diplombacy. President is the leader on the world stage we knew he would be the french president departs and german chancellor arrives on friday. A potential low historic meeting with trump and kim over north koreas nukes are emnan. How different reality is from the what the so called, experts protected not long ago . Thissad registration may be a series of flip mr. Foremans on Foreign Policy for four years that could put americans and people in jeopardy. We stepped away to Global Leadership and not only we stepped away we are got shoved off stage. Man poses safety and security of the us. On the world stage this president is humiliating america. The United States built up credibility and political
That was. But good evening from washington. I am laura ingraham. This is the ingraham angle. Youre looking at a live shot of the white house as President Trump concludes his first state dinner. We are expecting the departure of the french president macron and his wife at any moment. So much for the myth that trumps America First policy means isolating from entertaining and diplomacy. The president is now the leader on the world stage. That we knew he would be. The french president departs tonight and german chancellor Angela Merkel arrives on friday. Potential historic meeting between trump and kim jong un over north koreas nukes is imminent. So how different reality is from what the socalled experts predicted not so long ago. This Administration May be just a series of flipflops, waivers on Foreign Policy for four years. That would put a lot of americans and a lot of people across the globe in great jeopardy. We have stepped away to global leadership, and we are in fact not only have
Last year you drafted a dis sent in a case where a young woman in texas was seeking an abortion. You argued that even though the young woman had a h complied with the parental notification law and secured an approval from a judge she would nonetheless be barred. In making your argument, you ignored and i believe mischaracterized a Supreme Court precedent. You reasoned that jane doe should not be unable to exercise her right to choose because she did not have family and friends to make her decision. The argument rewrites Supreme Court precedent and if adopted, we believe, would require courts to determine whether a young woman had a sufficient support network when making her decision, even in cases where she is gone to court. This reason we believe, i believe, demonstrates that you are willing to disregard precedent and if thats the case because just saying somethings settled law, is it really correct law . The impact of overturning roe is much broader than a womans right to choose. Its
In garza v hargen. Thats a young woman in texas that was seeking an abortion. In that dissent, you argued that even though the young woman had complied with the texas parental notification law and secured an approval from a judge, she should have nonetheless be barred. In making your argument, you ignored and i believe mischaracterized a Supreme Court precedent. You reasoned that jane doe should not be unable to exercise her right to choose because she did not have family and friends to make her decision. The argue rewrites streupreme court precedent. And, if adopted, we believe would require courts to determine whether a young woman had a spisufficient support netk in making cases, even in cases shes been to court this reason, we believe, i believe, demonstrates that you are willing to disregard precedent. And if thats the case, because just saying something settled law it really isnt correct law. The impact of overturning roe is much broader than a womans right to choose. Its about p