improperly signed forms. some supervisors even gave their officers presigned blank warrants, in effect illegally happening them the authority to begin the deportation process. it seems i.c.e. has a mandate to grab as many people they think are immigrants as possible, not have to check if they re undocumented and get them out of the country. that s at least what it looks like. i think it s very clear there is a policy in place to try to make life very difficult for immigrants or people they think might be immigrants. one of the problems with this process is it creates an enormous incentive for racial profiling and communities of color suffer the worst impact from this policy. you re absolutely right, the policy involved in order to issue a detainer is really a sham from beginning to end. what happens is they essentially fill out a list of check boxes to decide whether someone stays or goes. whether someone is eligible for detainer or not. there is no individual probable
jurisdictions. cnn reported there is an i.c.e. officer fired last may for forging a supervisor for undocumented immigrants internal e-mails and i.c.e. documents obtained show that other officers across the five-state region were worked had improperly signed warrants on behalf of the supervisors on evenings and weekends and gave their officers presigned blank warrants illegally handing them the authority to begin the deportation process. it feels like i.c.e. want to grab as many immigrants, they think are immigrants as possible to get them out of the country. that s what it looks like. very clear there is a policy in place here of trying to make life as difficult for immigrants or people who they think might be immigrants. one of the problems with this process is that it creates an enormous incentive for racial profiling and communities of color that wind up suffering the worst impact from this policy.
burglaries and all sorts of other violent crime. it is unfortunate this issue gets mired in politics as opposed to sensible law enforcement policy. he pays the price, this officer and many lives i have bad dayss of people deported. come back in, deported, come back in. one in particular a 5-year-old boy abducted from a fair, brutally raped and murdered. i don t think we should be having policies that say we rest everyone. local law enforcement shouldn t be involved in deportation process. eric: sanctuary city policy should be tailored to criminals. if you break the law you should be deported rather than just asking are you here legally or not? that s a great question. the sanctuary state law in california does not prevent them from being able to interdict with violent criminals. my question is having been the head prosecutor, what directives are out there from
one is i.c.e. does a bunch of other things. yes. that are unrelated to these cruel and inhumane round up all the brown people raids and things like that. you know they deal with human trafficking, dealing with other issues. you could argue that maybe the bundle of responsibilities that they have doesn t make sense. that s what i m saying the sell is abolish ice o i.c.e. but what they say is abolish the mandate and this will turn into fix mode where they are not sows just rounding up people, we re not going to demonize, play the politics of the right and pretend all migrants are ms 13 opinion. and this is our metaphor for that we are making i.c.e. apgts do what they were supposesed unthe patriot act and not just be a round up force does that work. no chris and kathryn what the president has done is pulled the skap off the scam of catch appear release which is not a policy it s a phoney fares that both parties et go because there is police on flumgs to let people come in. that
people come in. that s not true. if you get rid of i.c.e. you have no deportation process. basically if you are if juror senator gillibrand and calling for the abolition of i.c.e. here is what you are saying. i don t want a country, no borders, anybody can come in. that s what it plays into but catherine you disagree you were disagreeing catherine. she is saying erase the country. no country. i don t think it s true that we have an open border policy. and i don t think it s true that people on the left are predominantly calling for an open border policy. which is another reason why i think the abolish i.c.e. slowing isn t misguided in that you alienate a lot of people moderate, center-left who believe we should have borderings and enforce immigration policy immigration law. but you can do that in a very different way from the way that we have now, including by prioritizing felons rather than