investment in fossil fuels and fossil fuels are not cheap, they are very polluting and they are destroying the climate that we all depend on. mil destroying the climate that we all deend on. , , depend on. all those things might be true, but depend on. all those things might be true. but given depend on. all those things might be true, but given the depend on. all those things might be true, but given the circumstances i depend on. all those things might be true, but given the circumstances in l true, but given the circumstances in which we are, this profit is a result of transitory factors. if the war were to end tomorrow, prices could drop back quite dramatically. these prices, it s not that they are in to spend more to get the oil out, they can take advantage of it. so long as it is in their hands to decide, we want to take everybody s money and use it to invest in polluting climate changing feels and our luxuries, so long as it s in their hands to make that decision, it s not
they re wide open to more. the chairman pointed out to that surprise june 28th hearing with cassidy hutchinson, saying, quote, something could come up. another member of the committee said additional hearings would, quote, depend on where the evidence takes us. ali, i ve heard that tons of evidence is still coming in, and that they re pouring through it all. is there a sense that the committee would have to, you know, have, at some point, a deadline to finish these hearings, as we get into the fall? also, as we get closer to the midterms. look, that s the question that i keep asking chairman thompson and other committee members. that s what we told me. when i said to him, is this the last hearing next thursday in primetime? he said probably, and that he hoped so, but he is open to the possibility of more. it s the same thing congressman jamie raskin told me when i asked him that question. it is because they ve been operating on these two parallel tracks for the entire summer.
the bat, certainly suggesting that this is an australian side that cannot be taken lightly stop there were lots of questions around some of the other 0zzie players going into this tournament, join top of the group now i of that big one on saturday. how do you see that when going? england are favourites. they will be expected to dominate the game. they are expected to make it very far in this tournament. but australian side who obtain england, it s the old rivalry, they get that extra little bit of energy commanded is a fixture that is unpredictable, much as the india pakistan game is quite unpredictable because of that rivalry. ink on paper are a better site in australia, but what we have seen today with the confidence that they are building, it is going to be a really interesting game, much will depend on who wins that ties. just briefl , depend on who wins that ties. just briefly. talks depend on who wins that ties. just briefly, talks about this world cup which could ve course thi
talk to me about the impact that this is having on the environment. so i think the impact is on the environment and but it s also on fisherman who depend on on. people restaurants hotels tourists. and people have been not doing this because they fear that the fish is contaminated and there has been some initial stanleys made by doing several universities here that have shown that most people would and fish was indeed montana makes it and they have found oil in there they gestate and risk respiratory systems and so recruitment a growing through a very difficult time right now and we re talking about dozens of thousands of fisherman because you know it s about 2000 kilometers of course mine and the government has said they were going to help but might be insufficient because the
the stock market should close tuesday in record or at least near record territory after a rather steady climb. it is the biggest jump for the dow since 2003. the s&p grew the most since 1997. the spending spree on wall street is in stark contrast to the pictures from main street, where just yesterday jobless benefits ended for 1.3 million americans. that economic disparity highlighted in the year-end column called guide posts on the road back to factville by my next guest, jared bernstein, the former chief economist for the vice president, also a cnbc and msnbc contributor. everyone knows how much i appreciate jared on this show. before i get to some of the points you have in your column, big picture here, is there a clear growing inequality in this country? does the notion of an economic trickle down effect a fallacy? in other words, wall street riding high, main street not feeling it. there s a very clear disparity between those who depend on, say, assets like