Mike mar again, i wanted to amplify that a little bit. Part of what we saw in the past years has been for example the Public Finance markets seizing up and so we have the funding mechanisms where we have a tax stream or an increment stream and dont have the way to stop the clock from ticking what we have crafted is that we with the developer look ahead and say how are we going to finance the development of these two or three leases . If at that point it looks like the markets will not be there we can adjust so that there is more up front money coming in so we use that cash payment to pay off or when we have also reserved the discretion to find other Public Financing sources. If there are other types of issuances that are well established than a port revenue bond or a cop and not that we have to do any of those things, but we can have that conversation. By having this phase process where at each phase we look around to say how is this going to work . That is how we address part of the r
Percent per year that is out out paced by the growth in the operating budget which has the individual of 3 percent per year. This is designated to capitol and expands and stabilizing our capitol budget and meets the ports policy to allocate 20 percent of the revenues each year to the plan, that said the forecast does identify opportunities and risks that the port should consider moving forward. And one such opportunity is the releasing of former americas cup sites and another opportunity and risk and related to the timing and scale of Development Near term and in some instances long term reductions to operating revenues directly impact our capitol repair and replacement budget. This must be balanced against the opportunity to attract private investment, reduce capitol liability and extend the life of port assets. The timing is important as well as the scale of development. The commission should also be aware that the financial forecast assumes that the capitol budget will meet our basi
Im pleased two of the bills i have authored are part of the Senate Version. It would be ripped out by the republican version, so i strongly support the Bipartisan Senate version, one i authored with representative poe in a bipartisan way. And that was the safer act. This took the monies and directed justice not to just spend money but process the backlog of d. N. A. Kits to put rapists behind bars and the campus save act. There is too much violence on campus. One in five women will be assaulted on College Campuses. This would require colleges to keep students safe. And also the bipartisan important antitrafficking bill is part of it. I urge my colleagues in a bipartisan, historic way, to reauthorize and pass the violence against women act, the Senate Version. Thank you. The speaker pro tempore the gentleladys time has expired. The gentleman from florida. Mr. Nugent continue to reserve. Ms. Slaughter i yield two minutes to the the gentlewoman from california, ms. Matsui the speaker pro
Host you can join the conversation on twitter, twitter. Com cspanwj. Or join the conversation on facebook, facebook. Com cspan. Lets look at some of the headlines. Usa today. The president and republicans jousted again yesterday. Host the headline on the story from the New York Times. republicans are calling the impact overstated and citing spending as a key issue. Here is what americans are saying. The wall street journal has a new poll. You can see the breakdown of numbers on the opinions of what each is opposing it to do. A 29 Approval Rating in terms of the sequester. 57 disagree with what the republicans are doing. 1 5 of respondents do think sequester cuts are a good idea. Austerity has killed off government jobs, says the New York Times. Host looking at some other stories. This from usa today. Host here is another headline about the misuse of power. We like to hear your thoughts this morning. Caller president obama will release over 10,000 dangers illegal aliens that are guilty
All we can do now is keep moving forward and grow into these people that we have determined to be. Back to that big story in a moment. We begin with a new charge today from the Russia Special counsel, and with that charge a major message. Lie or hide and you will be charged. Todays surprise, Robert Mueller charging a british lawyer for lying to investigators. At issue, his interaction with rick gates, who is already under indictment and who is now trying to make a plea deal. His longtime partner, paul manafort, who was a chairman with the campaign and whose business ties with russia are brought to the attention of mueller. The special counsel is well aware of these new charges. Shimon, how important is this to the substance of the Mueller Investigation and might it be, forgive me, more important to the tenor of the Mueller Investigation . I would say it goes more to the tenor. This lawyer looks like hes charnld with lying abo charged with lying about an interaction he had with rick gat