about christine blasey-ford. what this could mean for the mid terms. plus new concerns about the president s next move following the bombshell report about the deputy attorney general. you couldn t engineer a story in a lab more likely to enrage the president. i believe this is going to eventually result in rosenstein s removal, sessions removal, perhaps faster than we realized. we are beginning with the justice department pushing back, with the allegation that rosenstein one floated the idea of taping the president to expos the white house. it was shortly after the president fired comey. in the same meeting, he s also said to discuss recruiting cabinet members to invoke the thatth amendment.
the fbi but the justice department as well were more zealous in probing the president over allegations of russian collusion th theyng were in terms of getting to the bottom of the clinton probe. meanwhile, justice department pushing back and denying what you just reported on about deputyttorney general rod rosenstein threatening republican devin nunes. you heard him a moment ago, and his aides with a subpoena of their emails and phone records. democrats defending rosenstein, as did the attorney general jeff sessions on tucker s program last night. republicans are insisting this happened and it s a problem. watch. it is deeply concerning that instead of having a cooperative relationship with this agency, respectful of the importance of the congress, having access to documents regarding matters that they are investigating, that they have oversight responsibility for, and this is not the way to conduct that. more evidence republican from matt gaetz tweeting tonight the
excuse me, the washington post. and that he i think he s laid down a marker that you shouldn t do this. let s be honest, the two things preventing trump from getting rid of these guys is justice department pushing back and congress pushing back saying this is a red line, don t cross it, mr. president. there are. it s very interesting. i was glad to see that reporting last week that suggest he is willing to stand up to his deputy. it upon that a lead law enforcement person be willing to stand up for the institution. i agree him not saying anything about it today doesn t mean all that much. let s hope he stays strong in the case where they re actually faced with that. thank you all so much. and protesters outside the
but i was quite surprised and disappointed when we weren t going to have dueling members. frankly, i think one is bad, it politicizes it, but if your argument for that is the american people need to know, why shouldn t one s interpretation because we re not releasing the basic data here why shouldn t you have the interpretation up there competing with another interpretation? because it s interpretation. that s what it is. these are not the source documents. i m glad you mentioned that, because we learned that the president was mad when he learned on air force i about the justice department pushing back and releasing this memo saying it was dangerous, it may give us sources and methods. do you think it s become more important at this point rather than look out for the country, rather than look out for our institutions, it s more important to protect the president now? well, no, i think what s more important here is the truth of what s actually happened.
frankly, i think one is bad, it politicizes it, but if your argument for that is the american people need to know, why shouldn t one s interpretation because we re not releasing the basic data here why shouldn t you have the interpretation up there competing with another interpretation? right. because it s interpretation. that s what it is. these are not the source documents. i m glad you mentioned that, because we learned that the president was mad when he learned on air force one about the justice department pushing back and releasing this memo saying it was dangerous. it may give us sources and methods. do you think it s become more important at this point rather than look out for the country, rather than look out for our institutions, it s more important to protect the president now? well, no, i think what s more important here is the truth of what s actually happened. i meant to the folks in washington who are doing this. it has become more important, it seems, for suppo