they use five members of the michigan plot to do some more voting machine tests down in georgia. and the data that these guys get from the alleged breach of this voting equipment in georgia was ultimately sent to none other than stephanie lambert. that lawyer who now claims she has been indicted in the state of michigan. so i know everyone is waiting with baited breath, me included, for a charging decision in from jack smith. but don t sleep on the state. michigan in georgia are busy right now. i m next, a calendar is getting crowded as trump s legal woes pile up. what today s big announcement means for his mar-a-lago trial date, when we come back. when we come back. .the massage chair at the mall. but.he wasn t. gain flings with oxi boost and febreze. type 2 diabetes? discover the ozempic® tri-zone.
charges out of fulton county, georgia, which may happen in the next few weeks. at this very moment the mar-a-lago classified documents trial is scheduled to begin in a federal courtroom in florida on may 20th of next year. joining us now is our not so secret weapon, msnbc legal analyst lisa rubin. lisa, people don t even know how many questions you answered for me off air, but thank you for answering the questions on air. the first one is, does this superseding indictment change the timetable for the mar-a-lago trial? it could. we now have a three defendant case. we re gonna see some additional discovery. i don t think it will be as voluminous as what we have seen before, but there is going to be additional phone records, additional texts, additional surveillance footage. we know from the superseding indictment that they had surveillance footage of nada and de oliveira walking along the pool emitter of mar-a-lago.
president trump, now suddenly changed his travel plans to rush back to mar-a-lago. this is quoting from the new indictment. now, he provided inconsistent explanations for sudden travel to florida. at 7:14 pm on june 21st he texted one person that he would not be traveling with trump the next day, because he had a family emergency. and he used the xing emoji. shifting emojis, as in each. it is a secret. around the same, time mr. dealey vera reached out to another employee which is the head of i.t. and mar-a-lago, and he is likely the trump employee number four. quoting again, from the indictment. on monday, june 27th, 2022, at 9:48 a.m., the oliveira walked to the i.t. office where trump employee number four was working with another employee in the i.t. department. the oliveira requested that trump employee number four step away from the office.
department on mar-a-lago. he s being represented by stanley woodward who is also will not his lawyer. who s being paid for by donald trump super pack were has been paid by trump super pac. that seems interesting to me, because if one of his clients is potentially cooperating witness, and the other s time a tricky opposed to him legally speaking, how do you represent both of them without a conflict of interest? i don t know. there is a conflict there as far as we can tell looking from the outside. that is a clear conflict. i would be surprised if that is not raised by the prosecution, and they don t ask the judge for what is called a to decide whether, objectively whether or not there is intact conflict, and so i think that that is one of the things that we can probably look to see. there s so many question marks and so many more questions that i have including everything that you just raised. thank you so much for your time, please hang with us, we have a lot more to get to in to
saying that the reporting, the early reporting is that employee number four is the head of the i.t. department on mar-a-lago. he s being represented by stanley woodward who is also will not his lawyer. who s being paid for by donald trump super pack were has been paid by trump super pac. that seems interesting to me, because if one of his clients is potentially cooperating witness, and the other s time a tricky opposed to him legally speaking, how do you represent both of them without a conflict of interest? i don t know. there is a conflict there as far as we can tell looking from the outside. that is a clear conflict. i would be surprised if that is not raised by the prosecution, and they don t ask the judge for what is called a to decide whether, objectively whether or not there is intact conflict, and so i think that that is one of the things that we can probably look to see. there s so many question marks and so many more questions that i have including