implicated in what we were investigating. and so was not going to enforce a contempt against witnesses who were recalcitrant. hopefully that has changed but time will tell. we ll do everything we can. we ll use the tools that we have. those who refuse to testify, the public will likely draw an adverse inference. we hope to get as much of this evidence in the public realm as we possibly can. just to be clear, so our viewers understand what i think you re saying here is that the justice department would enforce whatever contempt measures it would take the justice department now led by merrick garland to enforce whatever can contempt measure to try to compel that testimony, correct? there s a lot of steps you would take before you ever got to that. first you ask for their
Slipp fotografen frem!
aftenposten.no - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from aftenposten.no Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Crónica / Capo de bomberos ho a por sextorsión
cronica.com.py - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from cronica.com.py Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
department to take a different position that it did under eric holder. there s a texas case that s going on now, being litigated. and the federal court has said there s discriminatory effect and intent in this texas voter i.d. law. and what attorney general sessions did was to instruct the justice department to take a different argument. prior to this, the justice department was arguing that there was discriminatory effect and intent. now they ve taken the position that there s no discriminatory intent and that a new texas law would n. llify any discriminatory intent that existed in the previous law. that is really inconsistent with what attorney general sessions said the last day of black history month a few days ago, when he talked about how important the justice department has been in guaranteeing the
on that type of behavior. i think the political people i worked with at the department of justice felt very strongly about the independence of doj and the separation between doj and the white house and would have pushed back and i hope the people running the justice department now, jeff sessions and the other people that came in with president trump, will feel the same way. of course, sessions would be recused in this instance and, presumably, would have nothing to do with deciding whether to turn that information over to the white house or not. jeremy and/or howard? a federal judge would have to order a wiretap of anybody suspected of being a foreign agent inside the united states. let s get one thing straight which is one of the aspects of president trump s tweet over the weekend was demonstrably false. it would have to be done with the say-so and approval of a federal judge who would find