there hasn t been a suggestion at the moment that there s credible evidence to believe a crime has been committed. isn t the president saying that if someone did in fact order wiretaps, which means they would have to get a fisa warrant. there would have to be some sort of evidence that shows that president trump or someone associated with president trump may have been had some untore id relationship or dealings with a foreign entity? not necessarily so. you could be legitimately investigating to determine what the efforts were by foreign powers, including russia, to influence the united states, without necessarily believing that a crime was committed by either the campaign or members of the campaign. i m not sure that necessarily follows, i don t think you re going to have to wait long before you find the fbi director is going to unless the
whether or not there s a first amendment question, it will be dressed by the court in an appropriate fashion. green card and visa holders are exempt. the preference for christians is gone. syrian refugees no longer indefinitely banned. the government has made a case the ban is needed to prevent terror here. it doesn t give a clean bill of health. there are going to be issues raised. they ll be challenged in the courts. people still don t like it, but this is a very watered down version, the president makes feels this makes him look weak because he had to water it down. i m sure he thinks that, but they should have read the decisions we had from the ninth circuit. no one has been saying in terms of what we were doing for extreme vetting didn t work.
there is no fisa court order? not to my knowledge. of anything at trump tower? no. trump s team isn t buying it. sean spicer speaking extensively offcamera, defending the president s tweet, there has been enough reporting that strongly suggests something occurred. continuing by saying lawmakers have a lot to look into. there is information that affects national security that has been leaked out, that concerns him. homeland security secretary kelly in an interview with wolf, backed the president. the president of the united states said he has his reasons to say he has some convince iin that needs to take place. assigning a special prosecutor is a way to ensure the investigation proceeds impartially. in the ongoing house intelligence panel inquiry. leaders are setting an aggressive timetable. sending this letter to the director of national
the government has made a case the ban is needed to prevent terror here. it doesn t give a clean bill of health. there are going to be issues raised. they ll be challenged in the courts. people still don t like it, but this is a very watered down version, the president makes feels this makes him look weak because he had to water it down. i m sure he thinks that, but they should have read the decisions we had from the ninth circuit. no one has been saying in terms of what we were doing for extreme vetting didn t work. and this proposal still has an attack on muslims, it s a ban on muslims, it basically admits they were wrong. you think it s going to hold up in court? no, i don t think so. in the report, we don t want you to have a tro, we don t want you to stop it the day it starts.
people on both sides are asking for proof, and it s really bipartisan be wilderment. members are saying they don t have any evidence to back up those wiretapping claims from the president. it s the fbi making the most public push nor clarification. tonight fbi officials are demanding a flat out denial from the justice department, but not yet getting one, this after president trump went on a twitter tie rate saturday. terrible, just found out obama had my wires tapped at trump tower just before the victory. how low has president obama gone to tap my phones. bad or sick guy. sources tell cnn, the fbi asked the doj to refute the claims. only a court can order a wiretap. the process to obtain a fisa application. involves many levels of senior loadership review, both within