fake outlet. pete: it s misinformation. all depends on who determines that. we have a first amendment and should be able to print effectively what you want and report news as you d like to report it. it s if the republicans were doing this with local newspapers, it would be deemed misinformation and would be shut down as a result. rachel: it would be shut down. they do that all the time. will: it does have to say paid campaign advertisement. if it s attacking a campaign or official democratic party pete: there s no problem finding left-wing journalists to write this and they have plausible denyability. rachel: you have outlets that write and turn down the algorithm and no one gets their stories from big tech. there s so much working against conservative points of view. it s a whole other level of campaign interference but in any case, it s hard to have a debate when you only hear one side. .pete: i remember when i wand
and manipulate republican primary elections. washington post said. a new level of absurd tee and far from defending democracy democrats are using claims that democracy is in peril to try to force moderate voters to support their left leaning partisan agenda. explain what s going on here. democrats are playing in republican primaries to try to boost election truth or deniers because they believe tactically that those people would be easier to defeat in the general election. they are pouring millions of dollars into races across the country and dana, it is not like this is some outside group where the democrats have plausible denyability. we can t condone that but it s not our policy or strategy. it is the official strategy of the democratic party. it is the senate democrats, democratic governors association have made this choice and we have had democrats sitting here now for a year and a half plus after
out there that s indispensable. the fact is what s happening with the organizations are the issue. the reason why the operation in the north is stall ukrainian resistance is a factor, logistics the other ones. as the vehicles we ve seen pictures of them sit on a road and they are so vulnerable. the ukrainians are able to take advantage of that. particularly at night when they are able to operate with cover. i also believe there is a lot the united states could be doing here. we have covert capability to intradikt those convoys. there is risk associated with that to be sure. you have to look at the cost and benefits of it but we have developed this capability over a number of years and it gives us denyability. we can also help covertly to bring in supplies. right now what s happening is ukrainians have to go to poland at the border to pick up the supplies and drive them back. at some point the russians will
providing other types of weapons to ukraine. different how? well, you get into a gray area here for sure. i think it has to be said the reality is, is it an escalation in the eyes of vladimir putin, right? we could argue all day the semantics weather anti-aircraft missiles are different. lethal aid from sending mission. if vladimir putin decides its a red line there is a concern there could be an escalation from there. the problem is that it was rolled out in a way that wasn t coordinated and was made public in such a way it could agitate again about putin s perception not whether international law or our own congress or members there debate it is an escalation or not. if they could find a way to do it such there was a plausible denyability. more planes that happen to be flown in ukraine. it might be less likely to push putin to something rash in response. i would also point out it won t
of the photographs, that seem to spread over a number of years. and to set up an idea that max well had any possible ability to deny what was going on, that she didn t know, she had no plausible denyability is what she is arguing in her case. it won t have many witnesses, it may have three or four, they go on a christmas break next week. they could have the case by next week, and we could have a decision by christmas. and she is not taking the stand? not so far, but i think it would be unlikely. always so good to see you my friend. happy holidays. about ten minutes from now closing arguments are set to get under way for elizabeth holmes.