drill, he can t be sure they ve got enough to determine whether this bone could have belonged to john the baptist. in jerusalem, the more john the baptist denounces herod, the more he risks enflaming herod s anger with all the danger that could follow. you can talk about repentance and judgment day and maybe not get into much trouble, but you start to attach herod antipas personally, and he s going to attack you personally. what s wrong? i see herod antipas as a really divided soul. he was really kind of caught between his ambition, his desire to rule and his desire for his wife.
with limits to how far he can drill, he can t be sure they ve got enough to determine whether this bone could have belonged to john the baptist. in jerusalem, the more john the baptist denounces herod, the more he risks enflaming herod s anger with all the danger that could follow. you can talk about repentance and judgment day and maybe not get into much trouble, but you start to attach herod antipas personally, and he s going to attack you personally. what s wrong? i see herod antipas as a really divided soul. he was really kind of caught between his ambition, his desire to rule and his desire for his wife. by marrying his wife, he had transgressed jewish law and that put him in a difficult situation as he sought to control his power. a man insults your wife, and
size if we re to extract the collagen for dating. with limits to how far he can drill, he can t be sure they ve got enough to determine whether this bone could have belonged to john the baptist. in jerusalem, the more john the baptist denounces herod, the more he risks inflaming herod s anger, with all the danger that could follow. you could talk about repentance and judgment day and maybe not get into much trouble. but you start to attack herod antipas personally, and he s going to attack you personally. what s wrong? i see herod antipas as a really divided soul. he was really kind of caught between his ambition, his desire to rule, and his desire for his wife.
the baptist walks with a new sense of conviction. for all his appearance as the wild man of the desert, john knows what he is doing by speaking out against sin. fearless of the consequences, he vents his anger on the moral corruption of herod, the puppet ruler installed by palestine s roman overlords. herod of antipas. i m here to warn you! in the first century, in the roman world, you weren t allowed to criticize a ruler. so someone like herod antipas had his own private army. he was watching everything very carefully. herod antipas was absolutely the worst kind of leader that you could hope for. he really needed to prove himself to rome. and because of that, he was a little bit overzealous, let s say.
drill, he can t be sure they ve got enough to determine whether this bone could have belonged to john the baptist. in jerusalem, the more john the baptist denounces herod, the more he risks inflaming herod s anger. with all the danger that could follow. you could talk about repentance and judgment day and maybe not get into much trouble. but you start to attack herod personally, and he s going to attack you personally. what s wrong? i see herod antipas as a really divided soul. he was really kind of caught between his ambition, his desire to rule and his desire for his wife. by marrying his wife, he had transgressed jewish law, and that put him in a difficult situation as he sought the control of his power. a man insults your wife and you let him get away with it.