territorial victory to push more forces from crimea into the center part of ukraine. we do know in ukraine s second largest city of kharkiv once again hard shelling overnight. russian missiles slamming into more buildings there. this video shows the police headquarters on fire after a russian strike. the scenes of total destruction are getting more widespread in kharkiv as russia ramps up its attacks on the city. russian paratroopers landed in the city overnight to support the ground offensive in this area. other images show heavy damage to the residential areas despite claims by russia they aren t targeting civilian populations. further west more evidence of russian forces striking residential homes as the russians try to demore allize the people they ve pledged to fight. defense ministry claims two fighter jets were shot down overnight. the city is tense. in the distance police and army checkpoints making sure no russian advance troops are
let s see. picking her, childs, would demore allize the base, side with corporate america. the fact that lindsey graham is vouching for her should give the white house pause. bernie sanders pac director. you didn t know that all these people were declaring war on judge childs? senator, i did not. i m not saying you did. you said you didn t know, i will take you at your word. but i am saying what is your judicial philosophy? i have a methodology that i use in my cases in order to insure that i am ruling impartially and that your judicial philosophy is to rule impartially. to rule impartially, no, and
0 whether or not they still present a threat to the united states or the world at large and i think it s six months, maybe a year. but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if there is a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states, they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator, i m not speaking to my views. my understanding is the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people. does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? senator, i m not in a position to speak to the policy or discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention is because in one of the briefs you argued the executive branch doesn t have that option. if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detai