the economic issues also keep latino voters away from their party. absolutely. these ideas aren t necessarily helpful. and the issues of choice, actually, are one of the number one reasons why latinas, young women, actually overwhelmingly voted for the president. it s the tone they re tone deaf to the actual changing demographics of america. let s back up here. short of comprehensive immigration reform, the gop is going to have a latino vote problem the following day. short of a pathway to citizenship. why? sure, you can provide individuals basically to be legal residents but then you have a whole class of american latinos walking around where people are going to question, are you an american? based on your, you know, based on the color of your skin? short of pathway to citizenship, you re going to have a latino vote problem. martin, i have quickly want to say, if you want to understand how difficult this issue is for republicans, look not at rand paul but marco rubio, himsel
expensive. that s simply the reality of it. and opposing tax increases doesn t change that reality. there s nothing in grover norquist s pledge that stops the ageing process. so there s no way the tax receipts of the 1960s will support the demographics of america in the 2030s. anyone who says otherwise is not taking the reality seriously. joining us is a man who always takes reality seriously. chris hayes. so one thing i always think is true in our political discussions is we don t like to face up to big changes. we like to use them as evidence for whatever policies are adapting. but the ageing of the society, i don t think we have come close to thinking about what that will mean for our economy or the government or any of it it. the only discussion we have is we re getting older so the entitlement programs will go bankruptcy. taking the reality seriously. joining us is a man who always takes reality seriously. chris hayes. so one thing i always think is true in our political discuss
have more of both. today the elderly make up 13% of the population. by 2050, they are expected to be 20%. that means you ll need to spend a lot more on social security and medicare. and we hope will keep happening and that will push the cost higher. the future turns out to be expensive. that s simply the reality of it. and opposing tax increases doesn t change that reality. there s nothing in grover norquist s pledge that stops the ageing process. so there s no way the tax receipts of the 1960s will support the demographics of america in the 2030s. anyone who says otherwise is not taking the reality seriously. joining us is a man who always takes reality seriously. chris hayes. so one thing i always think is true in our political discussions is we don t like to face up to big changes. we like to use them as evidence for whatever policies are adapting. but the ageing of the society, i
aging process. if there was, i would take it. so there s no way the tax receipts of the 1960s will support the demographics of america in the 2020s or the 2030s. anyone who says otherwise is not taking the reality seriously. joining us is a man who always takes reality seriously. chris hayes. religiously. religiously. so one thing i always think is true in our political discussions is we don t like to face up to big changes. we like to use them as evidence for why whatever policies we support need to happen. but particularly the aging of this society, i don t think we ve come anywhere close to thinking about what that will mean for the economy or the government or any of it it. the only discussion we have is we re getting older so the entitlement programs will go bankruptcy. we have to make cuts. when you think about it, what does a mature society value and how does it want to spend its marginal dollar. think as an individual, how do you want to spend it at 25 and how do you want
20%. that means you ll need to spend a lot more on social security and medicare. and we hope will keep happening and that will push the cost higher. the future turns out to be expensive. that s simply the reality of it. and opposing tax increases doesn t change that reality. there s nothing in grover norquist s pledge that stops the ageing process. so there s no way the tax receipts of the 1960s will support the demographics of america in the 2030s. anyone who says otherwise is not taking the reality seriously. joining us is a man who always takes reality seriously. chris hayes. so one thing i always think is true in our political discussions is we don t like to face up to big changes. we like to use them as evidence for whatever policies are adapting. but the ageing of the society, i don t think we have come close to thinking about what that will mean for our economy or the