important question. why didn t you stop and say mr. president, this is wrong? i cannot discuss this with you? great question. maybe if i were stronger, i would have. i was so stunned by the conversation that i just took it in. sean: maybe if he was stronger he would have said no? that is just pathetic. what a pathetic excuse. did anyone actually believe that? keep in mind, comey and his allies in the d.c. swamp have created an image that the fbi director is a champion of justice and beacon of truth. thatma explanation from comey proves everything that you ve been told about him is a farce. the guy plays politics betterou than most politicians in d.c. and here s another thing, if he waser so concerned about the president and told attorney general jeff sessions
destroy-trump-media has now come apart at thehe seams. they have been lying to you, the american people. msnbc was not the only outlet having to backtrack. hill is reporting that cnn issues correction after comey s statement contradicts their reporting. even abc was forced to update a story following comey s remarks and then of course, the so-called paper record, the new york times were singled out for being flat out wrong. i would argue again. take a look. that report by the new york times is not true. is that a fair statement? in the main, it was not true. they published a story, the headline of which was repeated contacts with russian intelligence. you were asked earlier if that was an inaccurate story and youi saidte in the main. would it be fair to characterize that story is almost entirely wrong? yes. sean: the new york times
no, he did not. reporter: would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version? 100%. sean: welcome back to hannity. the president hitting back hard against james comey s testimony. back with us with reaction, jay sekulow, anthony scaramucci and gregg jarrett. never under investigation.ba no obstruction. comey is the leaker. then he goes on and says let me go to one of these fake news guys in the news media and then he said i never asked for a pledge of loyalty. i never met this guy. the gospel truth since comeyy started in his angry, vindictive way because he s a fired, disgruntled employee. sean, this is the complete collapse of james comey and the comey narrative about this case. there s no case there.
sean: welcome back to hannity. earlier todaerence with the pref romania, the president slammed the fired, disgruntled former fbi director, james comey. yesterday showed no collusion, no obstruction. we are doing really well. that was an excuse by the democrats, frankly, james comey confirmed a lot of what i said. and some of the things he said just weren t true. reporter: wouldn t you be willing to speak under oath to give your version? 100%. sean: joining me now with reaction, our friend lou dobbs is with us. i ve watched this and we ve been talking about this. the president speculates my buddy says oh, obviously he says, i ve got tapes. you better not lie. lou, i think comey and a lot
the new york times. he goes under oath and says i did this to get a special counsel. by the way, it s impaneled the next day. sean: outrageous. d it s more than outrageous. it s a crime. then he shared this information. could you imagine if an fbi agent did a 302, the form that no one has seen but if he leaked it to the new york times h customer they would go to jail. sean: you are 100% right. gregg, jay, you re both right and have done great work here. you agree with jay s analysis, is it that serious and do you think something will happen as it relates to the comey and the law here? comey said these are his personal documents. no, they are not. they are government property. read the federal records act. the privacy act. which is actually published on