says there, democratic sources. what are your thoughts on this, jason? jason: i think democrats don t micro republicans point back to july 2017. there was a headline about impeachment proceedings having begun. the democrats have always presuppose the outcome. i think they thought mueller was going to deliver the goods. he didn t. i think they panicked. i don t see the evidence here. when donald trump released the transcript of the call, i don t think there is every utterance of there. my best evidence of that is that adam schiff had the lion make it up in the committee. i also think the horowitz and durum reports are coming out. the show vote out there, it s because they know that the horowitz report could be released at any time. that durham is on the tail of the origins of this, and there are a lot of us that really do believe democrats want to be
inquiry. so far we have seen damning evidence that the president abused his power and jeopardize our national security to help his own political fortunes. he pressed for another round of foreign interference in an american election. it is what the framers feared the most. harris: we ve heard from a couple of the chairman on committees come on the democrat side, after that impeachment inquiry vote was taken today. let s right away go now back to the republicans and a very outspoken congressman, lee zeldin, of new york. a couple days ago, he crossed into this new territory called witness coaching, and he wasn t very good at it. and it s not just getting close to the whistleblower. get this the jurisdiction of the intelligence committee is to look into intelligence-related matters. but adam schiff decided to days ago in his most recent rule
one year before harris: all right. you heard my call to listen to represented of doug collins. did you hear what he just said? he has now called the chairman of the house intel, adam schiff, as a witness in front of the house judiciary. he said, this is far from over. literally, on the left, the left side of the screen when we split them out, the democrats now are taking questions from the media. we ve been toggling back and forth. our team will tell me if we want to do that. meanwhile, there is a lot of meat on the bones to talk about here, jason chaffetz, in terms of what just happened with doug collins. jason: welcome he is the ranking member. that means he s the senior most on the judiciary committee for the republicans. to call out adam schiff like that, i think a lot of republicans are going to applaud that. you know what? adam schiff has kind of been the whistleblower whisper. there s been a lot of suspicion about the coaching and the development and how this document ca
calendar? 16 days, and only ate before we are on the collision course for the government to shut down again because we will run out of money. harris: november 21st. capri: the people of america are so disgusted that they are going to tune everything out. i want to say one more thing. as you guys know me on the couch, i always call it like i see it. this is the conclusion of come to, why the democrats have done this behind closed doors up to this point. they wanted to basically preinterview these witnesses. they wanted to ensure harris: that s why i asked congressman raskin. do republicans get a public bite at the apple again with these witnesses? let us all see what democrats have heard. capri: they want to end up like a situation like they did with mueller or comfort civil, corey lewandowski. they want to know that whatever they present, they know the answers are before they go. katie: are republicans going to be re-interview the people have been behind closed doors? ha
harris: with republicans fire down my furry words, liz cheney saying the democrats are obsessed with impeachment, turning the intel committee and should be impeachment committee. and in fact, the house until chair, adam schiff, is speaking now. simultaneous events. let s go there life. for lengthy periods of time come to do sustained questionin questioning, followed by member questioning. we have used this, i think, to great success for both parties during the course of the depositions. in the depositions we have alternated one hour for the majority and one hour for the minority. 40 minutes for the majority, 45 minutes for the minority. in those depositions, over 100 members have been eligible to participate. i should tell you, notwithstanding those who have complained about lack of access to the depositions, most of the members who have been permitted to attend have failed to attend. have not made use of the availability of attending each