probably what is also true is it has been building for a while. in the opening segment on the program at the top of the hour, there was a correspondent who listed various other instances where the president attacked judges by name. i m personally friends with a lot of judges. there are currently people who are judges who used to work with me and they will tell you it is not a pleasant thing when you do the job and follow the law these are republican appointed and democratic appointed, to have to worry that the president is going to tweet at you, that your family and children will be attacked and ridiculed and mocked and assaulted in words at least because the president of the united states has a different megaphone from everyone else in the country. yeah, of course, from time to time people criticize the judgments courts made. i have done it. i was a united states attorney for seven-and-a-half years and we didn t like what a court did. but there s a difference between
take you back inside, a rare chance to go back inside the supreme court chamber today, arguments about the president s travel ban, we played you democratic appointed justice kagan voicing skepticism. here s conservative justice alito saying it sounds okay to him. any reasonable observer reading this proclamation, without taking into account statements, think that this was a muslim ban? there are i think there are 50 predominantly muslim countries in the world. five muslim countries are on this list. the population of the predominantly muslim countries on this list make up about 8% of the world s muslim population. if you looked at the ten
the same documents. the legislature needs to get its act together and act as one. in many cases you might have people who are being defended with taxpayer money. they might make a complaint about that. we shouldn t be wasting taxpayer money on two duelling investigation. so there s some fear christie could buy time by the existence of two separate panels. the other piece that comes into it, is what is the u.s. attorney going to do. that s a democratic appointed u.s. attorney general. if you talk to a lot of democrats in new jersey, they think highly of him. they do not think that a major public corruption case is the kind of thing he has much of an appetite for. really? chris christie made his entire career on. couldn t do enough of these. paul has handled his office in a much more low key way. not the kind of appetite that chris christie has.
they see a potential here where christie is able to exploit the fact there are two duelling committees looking into this, i m not the expert, but their concern is there could be an opening there for christie to buy some time, basically saying the assembly is subpoenaing documents from this person. the senate is subpoenaing the same person. excuse me. the same documents. the legislature needs to get its act together and act as one. in many cases you might have people who are being defended with taxpayer money. they might make a complaint about that. we shouldn t be wasting taxpayer money on two duelling investigation. so there s some fear christie could buy time by the existence of two separate panels. the other piece that comes into it, is what is the u.s. attorney going to do. that s a democratic appointed u.s. attorney general. if you talk to a lot of democrats in new jersey, they think highly of him.
they might make a complaint about that. we shouldn t be wasting taxpayer money on two duelling investigation. so there s some fear christie could buy time by the existence of two separate panels. the other piece that comes into it, is what is the u.s. attorney going to do. that s a democratic appointed u.s. attorney general. if you talk to a lot of democrats in new jersey, they think highly of him. they do not think that a major public corruption case is the kind of thing he has much of an appetite for. really? chris christie made his entire career on. couldn t do enough of these. paul has handled his office in a much more low key way. not the kind of appetite that chris christie has. if you talk to democrats who are more cynical, they say, if this goes to the u.s. attorney, not sure how much is going to come out of it. you have people who predate the