after fees. basically, charles, they are suing the trump administration in order for them to speed up the happenings, getting rid of these regulations. it s a continuation of the same general suing the obama administration when it overstepped the boundaries of the presidency in egregious ways and succeeded stopping him on immigration, stopping him on some regulations by epa, which are equally egregious, and stopping the forced expansion of medicaid. democratic ag s are going to pick it up and do the same thing in the trump era. what impressed me is the fact that congress, in the old days of the 50s would ve never stood for these presidential encroachments, have become extremely atrophied is what i ve used democrats have allowed obama to do anything he wanted at their own expense, institutional expense. the ag s have now shown up and
after fees. basically, charles, they are suing the trump administration in order for them to speed up the happenings, getting rid of these regulations. it s a continuation of the same general suing the obama administration when it overstepped the boundaries of the presidency in egregious ways and succeeded stopping him on immigration, stopping him on some regulations by epa, which are equally egregious, and stopping the forced expansion of medicaid. democratic ag s are going to pick it up and do the same thing in the trump era. what impressed me is the fact that congress, in the old days of the 50s would ve never stood for these presidential encroachments, have become extremely atrophied is what i ve used democrats have allowed obama to do anything he wanted at their own expense, institutional expense. the ag s have now shown up and
your feet wealth. is that the only democratic ag you have is louisiana in your lawsuit? so far, yes. greta: as i understand, mid december you have your next hearing. we expect that a decision will be coming down from the federal court in virginia on the motion for summary judgment which is a little different because never a specific statute in virginia which says no individual mandates so it is a little different. they may get a decision before your next court date which will be an interesting dynamic. that s right. they probably will, ken cuccinelli says our arguments are going to be heard december 16th, here in florida, the motion for summary judgment. the judge will rule within thirty days on this motion. greta: pam, thank you. of course we ll be watching carefully. nice to see you. now you know the point of attack by states and some attorneys general. what about the new republican
i know you are just getting your feet wealth. is that the only democratic ag you have is louisiana in your lawsuit? so far, yes. greta: as i understand, mid december you have your next hearing. we expect that a decision will be coming down from the federal court in virginia on the motion for summary judgment which is a little different because never a specific statute in virginia which says no individual mandates so it is a little different. they may get a decision before your next court date which will be an interesting dynamic. that s right. they probably will, ken cuccinelli says our arguments are going to be heard december 16th, here in florida, the motion for summary judgment. the judge will rule within thirty days on this motion. greta: pam, thank you. of course we ll be watching carefully. nice to see you. now you know the point of attack by states and some attorneys general. what about the new republican